PIT vs. LRCU

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

PIT (VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF) and LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PIT is a Commodities fund actively managed by VanEck, while LRCU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. PIT charges 0.55%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for LRCU.

Performance

PIT vs. LRCU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIT achieves a 32.48% return, which is significantly lower than LRCU's 268.21% return.

PIT

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: -9.34%
• YTD: 32.48%
• 6M: 34.12%
• 1Y: 45.92%
• 3Y*: 21.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LRCU

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: 57.23%
• YTD: 268.21%
• 6M: 315.13%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIT vs. LRCU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	32.48%	11.94%
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	268.21%	172.36%

Correlation

The correlation between PIT and LRCU is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025	-0.13

Return for Risk

PIT vs. LRCU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIT

PIT Risk / Return Rank: 82
PIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
PIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
PIT Omega Ratio Rank: 78
PIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
PIT Martin Ratio Rank: 87

LRCU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIT vs. LRCU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PIT	LRCU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.84	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.66	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.95	—	—

Drawdowns

PIT vs. LRCU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIT drawdown since its inception was -12.27%, smaller than the maximum LRCU drawdown of -40.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIT and LRCU.

Drawdown Indicators

	PIT	LRCU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.27%	-40.09%	+27.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.56%	0.00%	-10.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.02%	-9.34%	+5.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.08%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PIT	LRCU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.99%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.29%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.58%	113.97%	-92.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.50%	113.97%	-96.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.50%	113.97%	-96.47%

PIT vs. LRCU - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIT has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than LRCU's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

PIT vs. LRCU - Dividend Comparison

PIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.73%, while LRCU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	6.73%	8.92%	3.59%	6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PIT and LRCU in my portfolio?

PIT and LRCU have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PIT or LRCU?

On fees, PIT is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PIT or LRCU?

PIT is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PIT or LRCU?

PIT has the higher dividend yield at 6.73%, compared with 0.00% for LRCU.

What is the main difference between PIT and LRCU?

PIT is categorized as Commodities, while LRCU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PIT and 1.30% for LRCU.