PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIT vs. FAAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PIT vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PIT vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
37.04%21.63%6.77%-4.54%2.74%
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
24.94%8.07%5.97%-5.63%1.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIT achieves a 37.04% return, which is significantly higher than FAAR's 24.94% return.


PIT

1D
-0.55%
1M
18.54%
YTD
37.04%
6M
43.92%
1Y
54.67%
3Y*
21.59%
5Y*
10Y*

FAAR

1D
-0.05%
1M
12.00%
YTD
24.94%
6M
21.95%
1Y
30.08%
3Y*
10.56%
5Y*
9.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PIT vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIT has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PIT vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIT
PIT Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
PIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIT Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIT Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

FAAR
FAAR Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FAAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAAR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FAAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAAR Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIT vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PITFAARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.59

1.97

+0.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.18

2.65

+0.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.35

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.85

2.71

+2.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.48

7.95

+9.53

PIT vs. FAAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIT Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the FAAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIT and FAAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PITFAARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

1.97

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.45

+0.65

Correlation

The correlation between PIT and FAAR is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PIT vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison

PIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.51%, less than FAAR's 9.21% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
6.51%8.92%3.59%6.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
9.21%11.63%3.45%3.20%5.82%6.49%3.05%1.02%0.58%2.83%

Drawdowns

PIT vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIT drawdown since its inception was -12.27%, smaller than the maximum FAAR drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIT and FAAR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PITFAARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.27%

-18.03%

+5.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.66%

-11.54%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-0.51%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.06%

-7.97%

+3.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

3.93%

-0.69%

Volatility

PIT vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) has a higher volatility of 10.09% compared to First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) at 5.66%. This indicates that PIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PITFAARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.09%

5.66%

+4.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.34%

10.64%

+6.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.28%

15.33%

+5.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.04%

13.00%

+4.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.04%

11.54%

+5.50%