PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIT vs. COMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PIT vs. COMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PIT vs. COMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
35.92%21.63%6.77%-4.54%2.74%
COMB
GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF
23.16%15.12%5.24%-7.75%1.15%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIT achieves a 35.92% return, which is significantly higher than COMB's 23.16% return.


PIT

1D
-0.82%
1M
13.34%
YTD
35.92%
6M
42.54%
1Y
53.49%
3Y*
21.26%
5Y*
10Y*

COMB

1D
-1.01%
1M
7.93%
YTD
23.16%
6M
29.16%
1Y
30.35%
3Y*
13.36%
5Y*
13.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PIT vs. COMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIT has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than COMB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PIT vs. COMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIT
PIT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
PIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
PIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

COMB
COMB Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
COMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMB Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
COMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMB Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIT vs. COMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PITCOMBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.53

1.77

+0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.12

2.34

+0.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.33

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.58

3.30

+1.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.49

9.08

+7.40

PIT vs. COMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIT Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the COMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIT and COMB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PITCOMBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

1.77

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

0.51

+0.57

Correlation

The correlation between PIT and COMB is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PIT vs. COMB - Dividend Comparison

PIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, less than COMB's 7.35% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
6.56%8.92%3.59%6.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
COMB
GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF
7.35%9.05%2.48%6.57%30.85%15.83%0.07%1.48%0.97%0.20%

Drawdowns

PIT vs. COMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIT drawdown since its inception was -12.27%, smaller than the maximum COMB drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIT and COMB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PITCOMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.27%

-33.50%

+21.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.66%

-9.19%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-1.01%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.06%

-12.25%

+8.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

3.34%

-0.10%

Volatility

PIT vs. COMB - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) has a higher volatility of 10.18% compared to GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) at 7.63%. This indicates that PIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PITCOMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.18%

7.63%

+2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.36%

13.86%

+3.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.27%

17.20%

+4.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.04%

16.54%

+0.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.04%

15.05%

+1.99%