PISMX vs. HLMSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PISMX (Principal International Small Company Fund) and HLMSX (Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, PISMX returned 6.76%/yr vs 6.07%/yr for HLMSX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PISMX charges 1.16%/yr vs 1.37%/yr for HLMSX.

Performance

PISMX vs. HLMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal International Small Company Fund (PISMX) and Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio (HLMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PISMX achieves a 5.20% return, which is significantly lower than HLMSX's 7.05% return. Over the past 10 years, PISMX has outperformed HLMSX with an annualized return of 6.76%, while HLMSX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.07% annualized return.

PISMX

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 3.14%
• YTD: 5.20%
• 6M: 7.15%
• 1Y: 16.87%
• 3Y*: 14.51%
• 5Y*: 3.93%
• 10Y*: 6.76%

HLMSX

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 3.52%
• YTD: 7.05%
• 6M: 9.40%
• 1Y: 7.54%
• 3Y*: 6.66%
• 5Y*: 0.39%
• 10Y*: 6.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PISMX vs. HLMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PISMX Principal International Small Company Fund	5.20%	32.35%	1.09%	13.19%	-21.93%	8.18%	5.60%	26.71%	-20.26%	35.80%
HLMSX Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio	7.05%	14.87%	-6.92%	11.78%	-24.50%	12.82%	18.51%	29.45%	-17.65%	34.42%

Correlation

The correlation between PISMX and HLMSX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015	0.87

The correlation between PISMX and HLMSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PISMX vs. HLMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PISMX

PISMX Risk / Return Rank: 14
PISMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
PISMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
PISMX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
PISMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
PISMX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

HLMSX

HLMSX Risk / Return Rank: 7
HLMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
HLMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
HLMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
HLMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
HLMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PISMX vs. HLMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal International Small Company Fund (PISMX) and Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio (HLMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PISMX	HLMSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	0.58	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	0.89	+0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.11	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.16	0.67	+0.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.99	1.66	+2.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PISMX vs. HLMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PISMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is higher than the HLMSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PISMX and HLMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PISMX	HLMSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.08	0.58	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24	0.03	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40	0.41	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.37	+0.05

Drawdowns

PISMX vs. HLMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PISMX drawdown since its inception was -43.91%, smaller than the maximum HLMSX drawdown of -60.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PISMX and HLMSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PISMX	HLMSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.91%	-60.77%	+16.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.73%	-10.59%	-3.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.73%	-16.57%	+2.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.48%	-38.22%	+1.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.91%	-38.22%	-5.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.94%	-8.62%	+4.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.60%	-13.22%	+2.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.99%	4.25%	-0.26%

Volatility

PISMX vs. HLMSX - Volatility Comparison

Principal International Small Company Fund (PISMX) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio (HLMSX) at 3.33%. This indicates that PISMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PISMX	HLMSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.31%	3.33%	+0.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.23%	9.66%	+2.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.86%	12.22%	+2.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.57%	15.04%	+1.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.85%	14.97%	+1.88%

PISMX vs. HLMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PISMX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is lower than HLMSX's 1.37% expense ratio.

Dividends

PISMX vs. HLMSX - Dividend Comparison

PISMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than HLMSX's 3.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HLMSX Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio	3.77%	4.04%	1.17%	1.00%	1.83%	2.82%	0.03%	0.52%	7.56%	1.13%	4.37%	1.54%
PISMX Principal International Small Company Fund	2.79%	2.93%	4.01%	1.97%	1.20%	9.45%	1.22%	2.83%	9.46%	4.93%	0.29%	1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PISMX and HLMSX in my portfolio?

PISMX and HLMSX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PISMX or HLMSX?

PISMX has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to HLMSX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PISMX dropped -43.91% vs HLMSX's -60.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PISMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.