PISMX vs. CMNWX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

PISMX (Principal International Small Company Fund) and CMNWX (Principal Capital Appreciation Fund) are both mutual funds - PISMX is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund managed by Principal, while CMNWX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Principal. Over the past 10 years, PISMX returned 6.73%/yr vs 14.88%/yr for CMNWX. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PISMX charges 1.16%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for CMNWX.

Performance

PISMX vs. CMNWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal International Small Company Fund (PISMX) and Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PISMX achieves a 4.08% return, which is significantly lower than CMNWX's 8.06% return. Over the past 10 years, PISMX has underperformed CMNWX with an annualized return of 6.73%, while CMNWX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.88% annualized return.

PISMX

• 1D: 2.60%
• 1M: -0.15%
• 6M: -0.38%
• YTD: 4.08%
• 1Y: 13.28%
• 3Y*: 12.51%
• 5Y*: 3.64%
• 10Y*: 6.73%
• ALL TIME*: 6.67%

CMNWX

• 1D: 1.67%
• 1M: -1.13%
• 6M: 6.58%
• YTD: 8.06%
• 1Y: 17.20%
• 3Y*: 19.55%
• 5Y*: 12.95%
• 10Y*: 14.88%
• ALL TIME*: 14.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CMNWX Principal Capital Appreciation Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PISMX Principal International Small Company Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

PISMX vs. CMNWX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PISMX Principal International Small Company Fund	4.08%	32.35%	1.09%	13.19%	-21.93%	8.18%	5.60%	26.71%	-20.26%	35.80%
CMNWX Principal Capital Appreciation Fund	8.06%	13.27%	32.14%	25.01%	-16.37%	27.45%	18.36%	32.21%	-4.12%	20.64%

Correlation

The correlation between PISMX and CMNWX is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015	0.74

The correlation between PISMX and CMNWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PISMX vs. CMNWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PISMX

PISMX Risk / Return Rank: 21
PISMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
PISMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
PISMX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
PISMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
PISMX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

CMNWX

CMNWX Risk / Return Rank: 42
CMNWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
CMNWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
CMNWX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
CMNWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
CMNWX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PISMX vs. CMNWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal International Small Company Fund (PISMX) and Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PISMX	CMNWX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	1.14	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.27	1.62	-0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.20	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.97	1.71	-0.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.89	7.29	-4.40

PISMX vs. CMNWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PISMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is comparable to the CMNWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PISMX and CMNWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PISMX vs. CMNWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PISMX drawdown since its inception was -43.91%, smaller than the maximum CMNWX drawdown of -50.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PISMX and CMNWX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PISMX	CMNWX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.91%	-50.43%	+6.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.73%	-8.91%	-4.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.73%	-19.54%	+5.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.48%	-23.35%	-13.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.91%	-33.26%	-10.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.97%	-2.47%	-2.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.53%	-6.92%	-3.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.61%	2.08%	+2.53%

Volatility

PISMX vs. CMNWX - Volatility Comparison

Principal International Small Company Fund (PISMX) has a higher volatility of 4.94% compared to Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX) at 3.39%. This indicates that PISMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMNWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PISMX	CMNWX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.94%	3.39%	+1.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.59%	10.45%	+3.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.87%	13.39%	+2.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.70%	16.94%	-0.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.63%	17.20%	-0.57%

PISMX vs. CMNWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PISMX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than CMNWX's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

PISMX vs. CMNWX - Dividend Comparison

PISMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, less than CMNWX's 8.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMNWX Principal Capital Appreciation Fund	8.10%	8.75%	10.03%	0.71%	0.69%	9.52%	5.33%	8.37%	46.60%	7.72%	10.32%	5.42%
PISMX Principal International Small Company Fund	2.82%	2.93%	4.01%	1.97%	1.20%	9.45%	1.22%	2.83%	9.46%	4.93%	0.29%	1.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PISMX and CMNWX in my portfolio?

PISMX and CMNWX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PISMX or CMNWX?

PISMX has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to CMNWX (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PISMX dropped -43.91% vs CMNWX's -50.43%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CMNWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.