PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIPNX vs. BRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PIPNX vs. BRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Income Fund Class I-3 (PIPNX) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIPNX achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly higher than BRW's -0.25% return.


PIPNX

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.90%
YTD
0.66%
6M
1.24%
1Y
7.12%
3Y*
7.26%
5Y*
3.14%
10Y*

BRW

1D
0.15%
1M
-2.78%
YTD
-0.25%
6M
0.62%
1Y
-4.10%
3Y*
8.94%
5Y*
6.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIPNX vs. BRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PIPNX
PIMCO Income Fund Class I-3
0.66%10.91%5.32%8.08%-9.14%1.61%
BRW
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund
-0.25%5.89%12.16%18.49%-4.64%3.19%

Correlation

The correlation between PIPNX and BRW is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2021

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PIPNX vs. BRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIPNX
PIPNX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PIPNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIPNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIPNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PIPNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIPNX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

BRW
BRW Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRW Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRW Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIPNX vs. BRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Income Fund Class I-3 (PIPNX) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PIPNXBRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

0.96

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

-0.23

+2.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.78

-0.40

+7.18

PIPNX vs. BRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIPNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the BRW Sharpe Ratio of -0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIPNX and BRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PIPNX vs. BRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIPNX drawdown since its inception was -13.42%, smaller than the maximum BRW drawdown of -17.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIPNX and BRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIPNXBRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.42%

-17.74%

+4.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.69%

-17.74%

+14.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.95%

-17.74%

+13.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.42%

-17.74%

+4.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-12.10%

+10.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.39%

-3.99%

+1.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.10%

10.16%

-9.06%

Volatility

PIPNX vs. BRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Income Fund Class I-3 (PIPNX) is 1.34%, while Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund (BRW) has a volatility of 4.17%. This indicates that PIPNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIPNXBRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.34%

4.17%

-2.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.39%

8.18%

-4.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.17%

13.33%

-9.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.85%

12.93%

-8.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.56%

12.89%

-8.33%

PIPNX vs. BRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIPNX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than BRW's 1.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

PIPNX vs. BRW - Dividend Comparison

PIPNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.69%, less than BRW's 15.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BRW
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund
15.71%14.46%12.27%16.02%13.82%4.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PIPNX
PIMCO Income Fund Class I-3
5.69%5.86%6.15%5.08%4.89%3.91%4.73%5.66%3.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


PIPNX and BRW have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRW has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to PIPNX (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIPNX dropped -13.42% vs BRW's -17.74%.

PIPNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PIPNX and BRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer