PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIPE vs. FENY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PIPE vs. FENY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (PIPE) and Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIPE achieves a 28.11% return, which is significantly lower than FENY's 33.41% return.


PIPE

1D
-1.16%
1M
2.22%
6M
20.40%
YTD
28.11%
1Y
30.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.77%

FENY

1D
-1.27%
1M
10.16%
6M
19.12%
YTD
33.41%
1Y
42.08%
3Y*
14.32%
5Y*
23.89%
10Y*
9.51%
ALL TIME*
5.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$46.38M$43.19M$52.93M
$149.15K$94.70K$92.96K

PIPE vs. FENY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PIPE and FENY is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025

0.68

The correlation between PIPE and FENY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

PIPE vs. FENY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PIPE
FENY

Energy

97.0%
99.6%

Utilities

2.0%
0.1%

Financial Services

1.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

0.3%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Energy

PIPE
97.0%
FENY
99.6%

Utilities

PIPE
2.0%
FENY
0.1%

Financial Services

PIPE
1.3%
FENY

-

Basic Materials

PIPE

-

FENY
0.3%

Communication Services

PIPE

-

FENY

-

Consumer Cyclical

PIPE

-

FENY

-

Consumer Defensive

PIPE

-

FENY

-

Healthcare

PIPE

-

FENY

-

Industrials

PIPE

-

FENY
0.1%

Real Estate

PIPE

-

FENY

-

Technology

PIPE

-

FENY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PIPE vs. FENY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PIPE
PIPE Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
PIPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIPE Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PIPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIPE Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

FENY
FENY Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FENY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FENY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FENY Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FENY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FENY Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PIPE vs. FENY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (PIPE) and Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PIPEFENYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.33

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.19

2.83

+1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.00

7.61

+2.39

PIPE vs. FENY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIPE Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the FENY Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIPE and FENY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PIPE vs. FENY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIPE drawdown since its inception was -15.69%, smaller than the maximum FENY drawdown of -74.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIPE and FENY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIPEFENYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.69%

-74.35%

+58.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.33%

-14.96%

+7.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.77%

-5.56%

+1.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.94%

-22.94%

+19.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

5.54%

-2.47%

Volatility

PIPE vs. FENY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (PIPE) is 5.57%, while Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY) has a volatility of 6.23%. This indicates that PIPE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FENY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIPEFENYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.57%

6.23%

-0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.06%

16.66%

-4.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.95%

20.91%

-5.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.62%

26.20%

-7.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.62%

29.78%

-11.16%

PIPE vs. FENY - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIPE has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FENY's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

PIPE vs. FENY - Dividend Comparison

PIPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than FENY's 2.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FENY
Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF
2.38%3.18%3.05%3.33%3.33%3.69%4.60%6.43%3.21%2.94%2.29%3.05%
PIPE
Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
3.75%3.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PIPE and FENY have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FENY has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to PIPE (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIPE dropped -15.69% vs FENY's -74.35%.

On 1-year performance, FENY leads with 42.08% vs 30.59% for PIPE. On fees, FENY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, PIPE has been the lower-risk option at 5.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FENY has performed better with a 42.08% return vs 30.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FENY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PIPE.

PIPE has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 2.38% for FENY.

PIPE is categorized as Infrastructure Equities, while FENY is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PIPE and 0.08% for FENY.

PIPE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PIPE and FENY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer