PIPAX vs. FHLFX
PIPAX (PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A) and FHLFX (Fidelity Series International Index Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PIPAX returned 10.97%/yr vs 8.85%/yr for FHLFX. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PIPAX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for FHLFX.
Performance
PIPAX vs. FHLFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PIPAX having a 9.45% return and FHLFX slightly higher at 9.53%.
PIPAX
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- 9.45%
- 6M
- 4.81%
- 1Y
- 17.95%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.62%
FHLFX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 12.09%
- 1Y
- 22.51%
- 3Y*
- 17.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.85%
- 10Y*
- —
PIPAX vs. FHLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIPAX PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A | 9.45% | 16.57% | 14.37% | 21.29% | -9.30% | 18.02% | 3.78% | 25.94% | -10.72% |
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund | 9.53% | 31.96% | 3.67% | 18.16% | -14.17% | 11.23% | 8.09% | 21.66% | -10.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIPAX and FHLFX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018 | 0.59 |
The correlation between PIPAX and FHLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIPAX vs. FHLFX — Risk / Return Rank
PIPAX
FHLFX
PIPAX vs. FHLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A (PIPAX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PIPAX | FHLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.27 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 1.91 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.00 | 7.17 | -1.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PIPAX | FHLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 1.47 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.56 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
PIPAX vs. FHLFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIPAX drawdown since its inception was -57.80%, which is greater than FHLFX's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIPAX and FHLFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIPAX | FHLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.80% | -33.58% | -24.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.72% | -11.37% | +0.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.24% | -13.62% | -1.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.17% | -29.36% | +10.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.42% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.36% | -6.11% | -1.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 3.03% | +0.05% |
Volatility
PIPAX vs. FHLFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A (PIPAX) is 3.68%, while Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that PIPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIPAX | FHLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 4.64% | -0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.05% | 12.08% | +0.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.72% | 14.83% | -0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.27% | 15.98% | -1.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.66% | 17.64% | -2.98% |
PIPAX vs. FHLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIPAX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLFX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
PIPAX vs. FHLFX - Dividend Comparison
PIPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, more than FHLFX's 3.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund | 3.16% | 3.46% | 2.98% | 2.86% | 2.60% | 2.47% | 1.92% | 1.95% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PIPAX PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A | 5.13% | 5.61% | 12.69% | 10.56% | 10.66% | 7.59% | 1.44% | 11.71% | 8.25% | 7.38% | 0.78% | 8.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PIPAX and FHLFX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FHLFX has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to PIPAX (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIPAX dropped -57.80% vs FHLFX's -33.58%.
FHLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PIPAX and FHLFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer