PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIPAX vs. FHLFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PIPAX vs. FHLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A (PIPAX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PIPAX having a 9.45% return and FHLFX slightly higher at 9.53%.


PIPAX

1D
0.66%
1M
4.57%
YTD
9.45%
6M
4.81%
1Y
17.95%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
10.97%
10Y*
11.62%

FHLFX

1D
0.42%
1M
4.09%
YTD
9.53%
6M
12.09%
1Y
22.51%
3Y*
17.18%
5Y*
8.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIPAX vs. FHLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PIPAX
PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A
9.45%16.57%14.37%21.29%-9.30%18.02%3.78%25.94%-10.72%
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
9.53%31.96%3.67%18.16%-14.17%11.23%8.09%21.66%-10.70%

Correlation

The correlation between PIPAX and FHLFX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018

0.59

The correlation between PIPAX and FHLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PIPAX vs. FHLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIPAX
PIPAX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
PIPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PIPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

FHLFX
FHLFX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FHLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIPAX vs. FHLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A (PIPAX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PIPAXFHLFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.27

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

1.91

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.00

7.17

-1.17

PIPAX vs. FHLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIPAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the FHLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIPAX and FHLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PIPAXFHLFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

1.47

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.56

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.53

0.00

Drawdowns

PIPAX vs. FHLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIPAX drawdown since its inception was -57.80%, which is greater than FHLFX's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIPAX and FHLFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIPAXFHLFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.80%

-33.58%

-24.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.72%

-11.37%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.24%

-13.62%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.17%

-29.36%

+10.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.42%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.36%

-6.11%

-1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

3.03%

+0.05%

Volatility

PIPAX vs. FHLFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A (PIPAX) is 3.68%, while Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that PIPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIPAXFHLFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

4.64%

-0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.05%

12.08%

+0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.72%

14.83%

-0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.27%

15.98%

-1.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.66%

17.64%

-2.98%

PIPAX vs. FHLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIPAX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLFX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

PIPAX vs. FHLFX - Dividend Comparison

PIPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, more than FHLFX's 3.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
3.16%3.46%2.98%2.86%2.60%2.47%1.92%1.95%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PIPAX
PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class A
5.13%5.61%12.69%10.56%10.66%7.59%1.44%11.71%8.25%7.38%0.78%8.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


PIPAX and FHLFX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FHLFX has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to PIPAX (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIPAX dropped -57.80% vs FHLFX's -33.58%.

FHLFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PIPAX and FHLFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer