PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PINK vs. RSPH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PINK vs. RSPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PINK vs. RSPH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PINK
Simplify Health Care ETF
-7.35%24.34%8.81%3.80%-4.41%12.20%
RSPH
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF
-4.53%9.52%-0.94%3.95%-9.40%8.47%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PINK achieves a -7.35% return, which is significantly lower than RSPH's -4.53% return.


PINK

1D
0.59%
1M
-6.30%
YTD
-7.35%
6M
5.14%
1Y
18.61%
3Y*
11.27%
5Y*
10Y*

RSPH

1D
0.52%
1M
-7.75%
YTD
-4.53%
6M
1.59%
1Y
4.05%
3Y*
2.06%
5Y*
3.21%
10Y*
8.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PINK vs. RSPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

PINK has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPH's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PINK vs. RSPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PINK
PINK Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
PINK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PINK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
PINK Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PINK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
PINK Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

RSPH
RSPH Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
RSPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPH Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPH Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PINK vs. RSPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PINKRSPHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.91

0.21

+0.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.38

0.43

+0.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.05

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

0.26

+0.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.37

0.76

+2.61

PINK vs. RSPH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PINK Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is higher than the RSPH Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PINK and RSPH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PINKRSPHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

0.21

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.58

-0.14

Correlation

The correlation between PINK and RSPH is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PINK vs. RSPH - Dividend Comparison

PINK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, which matches RSPH's 0.74% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PINK
Simplify Health Care ETF
0.74%0.68%0.32%0.94%0.42%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSPH
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF
0.74%0.70%0.71%0.66%0.64%0.50%0.51%0.54%0.53%0.47%0.48%0.49%

Drawdowns

PINK vs. RSPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PINK drawdown since its inception was -18.77%, smaller than the maximum RSPH drawdown of -40.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINK and RSPH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PINKRSPHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.77%

-40.49%

+21.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.81%

-10.87%

-5.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.08%

-8.58%

-3.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.73%

-6.13%

-0.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.86%

3.67%

+1.19%

Volatility

PINK vs. RSPH - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) has a higher volatility of 7.40% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH) at 5.53%. This indicates that PINK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PINKRSPHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.40%

5.53%

+1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.96%

10.63%

+3.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.58%

19.06%

+1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.57%

16.18%

+1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.57%

17.73%

-0.16%