PINDX vs. XILSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PINDX (Pioneer Disciplined Growth Fund) and XILSX (Pioneer ILS Interval Fund) are both mutual funds - PINDX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Amundi, while XILSX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Amundi. Over the past 5 years, PINDX returned 13.74%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for XILSX. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. PINDX charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.88%/yr for XILSX.

Performance

PINDX vs. XILSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pioneer Disciplined Growth Fund (PINDX) and Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PINDX achieves a 11.68% return, which is significantly higher than XILSX's 7.97% return.

PINDX

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 5.28%
• YTD: 11.68%
• 6M: 9.92%
• 1Y: 32.35%
• 3Y*: 22.25%
• 5Y*: 13.74%
• 10Y*: 16.66%

XILSX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.97%
• YTD: 7.97%
• 6M: 10.49%
• 1Y: 24.81%
• 3Y*: 19.66%
• 5Y*: 12.34%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PINDX vs. XILSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PINDX Pioneer Disciplined Growth Fund	11.68%	21.16%	19.33%	28.67%	-21.49%	25.59%	34.78%	35.61%	-5.08%	23.16%
XILSX Pioneer ILS Interval Fund	7.97%	18.70%	18.93%	18.65%	1.23%	-1.10%	7.37%	2.60%	-2.11%	-8.83%

Correlation

The correlation between PINDX and XILSX is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017	-0.00

Return for Risk

PINDX vs. XILSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PINDX

PINDX Risk / Return Rank: 42
PINDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
PINDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
PINDX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
PINDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
PINDX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

XILSX

XILSX Risk / Return Rank: 100
XILSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
XILSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
XILSX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
XILSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
XILSX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PINDX vs. XILSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pioneer Disciplined Growth Fund (PINDX) and Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PINDX	XILSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	8.17	-6.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	81.24	-78.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	43.21	-41.86
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	117.99	-115.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.98	805.46	-797.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PINDX vs. XILSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PINDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is lower than the XILSX Sharpe Ratio of 8.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PINDX and XILSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PINDX	XILSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.06	8.17	-6.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	3.29	-2.59
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	1.63	-1.15

Drawdowns

PINDX vs. XILSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PINDX drawdown since its inception was -52.37%, which is greater than XILSX's maximum drawdown of -14.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINDX and XILSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PINDX	XILSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.37%	-14.53%	-37.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.64%	-0.21%	-14.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.52%	-2.36%	-21.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.77%	-6.27%	-22.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.50%	0.00%	-0.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.48%	-4.91%	-6.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.26%	0.03%	+4.23%

Volatility

PINDX vs. XILSX - Volatility Comparison

Pioneer Disciplined Growth Fund (PINDX) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to Pioneer ILS Interval Fund (XILSX) at 0.43%. This indicates that PINDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XILSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PINDX	XILSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.93%	0.43%	+3.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.44%	2.11%	+10.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.58%	3.08%	+13.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.74%	3.77%	+15.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.54%	3.93%	+15.61%

PINDX vs. XILSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PINDX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than XILSX's 1.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

PINDX vs. XILSX - Dividend Comparison

PINDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, less than XILSX's 8.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PINDX Pioneer Disciplined Growth Fund	4.04%	4.51%	6.34%	0.17%	7.23%	33.14%	27.35%	5.20%	26.83%	12.86%	8.57%	6.14%
XILSX Pioneer ILS Interval Fund	8.81%	9.51%	13.06%	12.82%	2.68%	2.04%	5.20%	6.63%	6.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PINDX and XILSX in my portfolio?

PINDX and XILSX have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PINDX or XILSX?

PINDX has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to XILSX (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PINDX dropped -52.37% vs XILSX's -14.53%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XILSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.17 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.