PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PINDX vs. FSPGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PINDX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pioneer Disciplined Growth Fund (PINDX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PINDX achieves a 9.09% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's 4.50% return.


PINDX

1D
1.76%
1M
0.00%
YTD
9.09%
6M
8.63%
1Y
27.65%
3Y*
19.96%
5Y*
13.02%
10Y*
16.52%

FSPGX

1D
1.38%
1M
-1.25%
YTD
4.50%
6M
3.80%
1Y
22.80%
3Y*
22.67%
5Y*
14.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PINDX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PINDX
Pioneer Disciplined Growth Fund
9.09%21.16%19.33%28.67%-21.49%25.59%34.78%35.61%-5.08%26.41%
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
4.50%18.54%33.27%42.77%-29.17%27.57%38.46%36.38%-1.79%27.70%

Correlation

The correlation between PINDX and FSPGX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.94

The correlation between PINDX and FSPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PINDX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PINDX
PINDX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
PINDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PINDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
PINDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
PINDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
PINDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPGX
FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PINDX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pioneer Disciplined Growth Fund (PINDX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PINDXFSPGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.24

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

1.37

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.10

4.51

+1.59

PINDX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PINDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PINDX and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PINDX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PINDX drawdown since its inception was -52.37%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINDX and FSPGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PINDXFSPGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.37%

-32.66%

-19.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.64%

-16.17%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.52%

-23.32%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.77%

-32.66%

+3.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.81%

-4.14%

+1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.46%

-6.36%

-5.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.36%

4.91%

-0.55%

Volatility

PINDX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

Pioneer Disciplined Growth Fund (PINDX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) have volatilities of 6.26% and 5.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PINDXFSPGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.26%

5.97%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.42%

12.68%

+0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.32%

16.13%

+1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.88%

21.60%

-1.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.60%

21.56%

-1.96%

PINDX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PINDX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

PINDX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

PINDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, more than FSPGX's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
0.33%0.34%0.37%0.73%0.86%2.22%1.76%1.04%1.32%0.22%0.00%0.00%
PINDX
Pioneer Disciplined Growth Fund
4.14%4.51%6.34%0.17%7.23%33.14%27.35%5.20%26.83%12.86%8.57%6.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, PINDX and FSPGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PINDX has higher volatility (6.26%) compared to FSPGX (5.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PINDX dropped -52.37% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

PINDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PINDX and FSPGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer