PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIMIX vs. GIBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PIMIX vs. GIBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class (PIMIX) and Guggenheim Total Return Bond Fund (GIBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIMIX achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly higher than GIBIX's -0.74% return. Over the past 10 years, PIMIX has outperformed GIBIX with an annualized return of 4.42%, while GIBIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.45% annualized return.


PIMIX

1D
-0.28%
1M
-1.47%
6M
-0.55%
YTD
-0.05%
1Y
4.30%
3Y*
6.95%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*
4.42%
ALL TIME*
6.57%

GIBIX

1D
-0.26%
1M
-1.56%
6M
-0.95%
YTD
-0.74%
1Y
2.08%
3Y*
5.02%
5Y*
-0.22%
10Y*
2.45%
ALL TIME*
3.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PIMIX vs. GIBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PIMIX
PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class
-0.05%11.08%5.45%9.36%-9.07%2.62%5.84%8.10%0.63%8.63%
GIBIX
Guggenheim Total Return Bond Fund
-0.74%8.22%3.18%7.45%-16.38%-0.58%14.94%4.45%0.89%6.50%

Correlation

The correlation between PIMIX and GIBIX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.59

Over the past year, PIMIX and GIBIX have become more correlated (0.91) than their long-term average of 0.59, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PIMIX vs. GIBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PIMIX
PIMIX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
PIMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
PIMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

GIBIX
GIBIX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
GIBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
GIBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PIMIX vs. GIBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class (PIMIX) and Guggenheim Total Return Bond Fund (GIBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PIMIXGIBIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.13

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

0.95

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.32

2.50

+1.82

PIMIX vs. GIBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the GIBIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIMIX and GIBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PIMIX vs. GIBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIMIX drawdown since its inception was -13.39%, smaller than the maximum GIBIX drawdown of -21.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIMIX and GIBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIMIXGIBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.39%

-21.44%

+8.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.69%

-2.99%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.69%

-4.94%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.34%

-21.44%

+8.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.39%

-21.44%

+8.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

-2.52%

+0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.68%

-3.40%

+1.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.16%

1.13%

+0.03%

Volatility

PIMIX vs. GIBIX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class (PIMIX) has a higher volatility of 1.17% compared to Guggenheim Total Return Bond Fund (GIBIX) at 0.92%. This indicates that PIMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIMIXGIBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.17%

0.92%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.56%

3.09%

+0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.15%

3.85%

+0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.89%

5.82%

-0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.26%

4.78%

-0.52%

PIMIX vs. GIBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIMIX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than GIBIX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PIMIX vs. GIBIX - Dividend Comparison

PIMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.34%, more than GIBIX's 4.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GIBIX
Guggenheim Total Return Bond Fund
4.77%5.03%4.71%4.44%3.08%3.36%4.80%2.38%3.25%3.38%4.68%4.39%
PIMIX
PIMCO Income Fund Institutional Class
5.34%6.01%6.27%6.21%4.98%4.02%4.88%5.83%5.66%5.37%5.52%7.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, PIMIX and GIBIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PIMIX has higher volatility (1.17%) compared to GIBIX (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIMIX dropped -13.39% vs GIBIX's -21.44%.

PIMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PIMIX and GIBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer