GIBIX vs. VOO

In the year-to-date period, GIBIX achieves a 1.94% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 1.84% return. Over the past 10 years, GIBIX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 2.35%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.82% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

GIBIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Total Return Bond Fund (GIBIX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current GIBIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GIBIX and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

GIBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, more than VOO's 1.28% yield.

The maximum GIBIX drawdown since its inception was -22.03%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GIBIX and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Guggenheim Total Return Bond Fund (GIBIX) is 1.34%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that GIBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.