PIM vs. MWIGX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PIM (Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust) and MWIGX (Metropolitan West Investment Grade Credit Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, PIM returned 2.22%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for MWIGX. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PIM charges 1.09%/yr vs 1.87%/yr for MWIGX.

Performance

PIM vs. MWIGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust (PIM) and Metropolitan West Investment Grade Credit Fund (MWIGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIM achieves a -1.81% return, which is significantly lower than MWIGX's 0.20% return.

PIM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.96%
• YTD: -1.81%
• 6M: 1.53%
• 1Y: 3.05%
• 3Y*: 8.58%
• 5Y*: 2.22%
• 10Y*: 4.35%

MWIGX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 0.61%
• YTD: 0.20%
• 6M: 0.57%
• 1Y: 4.77%
• 3Y*: 5.50%
• 5Y*: 0.74%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIM vs. MWIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PIM Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust	-1.81%	10.91%	10.88%	8.45%	-12.49%	-0.44%	-2.97%	20.68%	-5.08%
MWIGX Metropolitan West Investment Grade Credit Fund	0.20%	7.99%	3.82%	6.55%	-13.01%	-1.13%	8.41%	11.21%	4.27%

Correlation

The correlation between PIM and MWIGX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2018	0.23

Return for Risk

PIM vs. MWIGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIM

PIM Risk / Return Rank: 5
PIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
PIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
PIM Omega Ratio Rank: 4
PIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
PIM Martin Ratio Rank: 5

MWIGX

MWIGX Risk / Return Rank: 34
MWIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
MWIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
MWIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
MWIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
MWIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIM vs. MWIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust (PIM) and Metropolitan West Investment Grade Credit Fund (MWIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PIM	MWIGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.27	1.52	-1.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.53	2.37	-1.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.29	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.47	2.10	-1.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.07	6.60	-5.53

PIM vs. MWIGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIM Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the MWIGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIM and MWIGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PIM vs. MWIGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIM drawdown since its inception was -43.27%, which is greater than MWIGX's maximum drawdown of -18.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIM and MWIGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PIM	MWIGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.27%	-18.32%	-24.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.45%	-2.35%	-4.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.91%	-3.88%	-4.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.66%	-18.32%	+0.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.82%	-1.06%	-2.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.52%	-4.45%	-5.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.85%	0.74%	+2.11%

Volatility

PIM vs. MWIGX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust (PIM) has a higher volatility of 2.32% compared to Metropolitan West Investment Grade Credit Fund (MWIGX) at 1.17%. This indicates that PIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MWIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PIM	MWIGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.32%	1.17%	+1.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.68%	2.47%	+6.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.38%	3.23%	+8.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.74%	4.95%	+5.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.12%	4.76%	+8.36%

PIM vs. MWIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIM has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is lower than MWIGX's 1.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

PIM vs. MWIGX - Dividend Comparison

PIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.63%, more than MWIGX's 4.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MWIGX Metropolitan West Investment Grade Credit Fund	4.06%	3.70%	4.52%	4.97%	6.33%	4.25%	9.21%	12.03%	3.98%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PIM Putnam Master Intermediate Income Trust	7.63%	7.90%	8.10%	8.28%	8.25%	6.68%	8.32%	7.59%	6.82%	6.54%	6.77%	6.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PIM and MWIGX in my portfolio?

PIM and MWIGX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PIM or MWIGX?

PIM has higher volatility (2.32%) compared to MWIGX (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIM dropped -43.27% vs MWIGX's -18.32%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MWIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.