PILL vs. NBIG
PILL (Direxion Daily Pharmaceutical & Medical Bull 3X Shares) and NBIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. PILL is passively managed, while NBIG is actively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PILL charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NBIG.
Performance
PILL vs. NBIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PILL achieves a 20.53% return, which is significantly lower than NBIG's 565.40% return.
PILL
- 1D
- 5.04%
- 1M
- 21.49%
- YTD
- 20.53%
- 6M
- 14.24%
- 1Y
- 186.97%
- 3Y*
- 22.38%
- 5Y*
- -7.95%
- 10Y*
- —
NBIG
- 1D
- -1.88%
- 1M
- 60.92%
- YTD
- 565.40%
- 6M
- 432.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PILL vs. NBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PILL Direxion Daily Pharmaceutical & Medical Bull 3X Shares | 20.53% | 47.32% |
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 565.40% | -59.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between PILL and NBIG is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PILL vs. NBIG — Risk / Return Rank
PILL
NBIG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PILL vs. NBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Pharmaceutical & Medical Bull 3X Shares (PILL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PILL | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.67 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.65 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PILL vs. NBIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PILL drawdown since its inception was -88.76%, which is greater than NBIG's maximum drawdown of -75.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PILL and NBIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PILL | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.76% | -75.83% | -12.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.70% | -1.88% | -56.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.54% | -40.91% | -17.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.07% | — | — |
Volatility
PILL vs. NBIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PILL | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.72% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.99% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.50% | 199.52% | -137.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.58% | 199.52% | -138.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.78% | 199.52% | -135.74% |
PILL vs. NBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PILL has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than NBIG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
PILL vs. NBIG - Dividend Comparison
PILL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, while NBIG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PILL Direxion Daily Pharmaceutical & Medical Bull 3X Shares | 0.52% | 0.69% | 1.28% | 1.83% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.38% | 0.91% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PILL and NBIG have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NBIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NBIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for PILL.
PILL has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for NBIG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for PILL and 0.75% for NBIG.
Find the right allocation for PILL and NBIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer