PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PII vs. LCII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PII vs. LCII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polaris Industries Inc. (PII) and LCI Industries (LCII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PII achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly higher than LCII's -19.28% return. Over the past 10 years, PII has underperformed LCII with an annualized return of 0.96%, while LCII has yielded a comparatively higher 5.23% annualized return.


PII

1D
0.79%
1M
5.17%
YTD
11.17%
6M
7.00%
1Y
73.80%
3Y*
-11.48%
5Y*
-8.33%
10Y*
0.96%

LCII

1D
-10.06%
1M
-13.39%
YTD
-19.28%
6M
-14.83%
1Y
13.04%
3Y*
-1.56%
5Y*
-5.25%
10Y*
5.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PII vs. LCII - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PII
Polaris Industries Inc.
11.17%15.90%-37.19%-3.79%-6.01%17.75%-3.78%36.37%-36.76%54.19%
LCII
LCI Industries
-19.28%22.83%-14.64%41.10%-38.49%23.07%24.13%65.13%-47.23%23.05%

Correlation

The correlation between PII and LCII is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 1989

0.34

Over the past year, PII and LCII have become more correlated (0.56) than their long-term average of 0.34, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PII:

$3.95B

LCII:

$2.34B

EPS

PII:

-$7.82

LCII:

$7.63

PS Ratio

PII:

0.54

LCII:

0.57

PB Ratio

PII:

5.27

LCII:

1.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

PII:

$7.27B

LCII:

$4.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PII:

$1.43B

LCII:

$980.30M

EBITDA (TTM)

PII:

-$206.10M

LCII:

$381.13M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PII vs. LCII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PII
PII Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
PII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PII Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
PII Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
PII Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PII Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

LCII
LCII Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
LCII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCII Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCII Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
LCII Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCII Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PII vs. LCII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polaris Industries Inc. (PII) and LCI Industries (LCII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PIILCIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.10

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

0.35

+1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.32

0.96

+5.36

PII vs. LCII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PII Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the LCII Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PII and LCII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PIILCIIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

0.37

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

-0.13

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

0.13

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.29

+0.11

Drawdowns

PII vs. LCII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PII drawdown since its inception was -77.57%, smaller than the maximum LCII drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PII and LCII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIILCIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.57%

-87.55%

+9.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.21%

-37.67%

+3.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-75.23%

-41.12%

-34.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.23%

-47.19%

-28.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.62%

-53.89%

-21.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.23%

-37.67%

-6.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.73%

-25.25%

+5.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.72%

13.67%

-1.95%

Volatility

PII vs. LCII - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Polaris Industries Inc. (PII) is 12.51%, while LCI Industries (LCII) has a volatility of 14.28%. This indicates that PII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIILCIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.51%

14.28%

-1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.57%

26.68%

+10.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.69%

35.33%

+20.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.69%

39.27%

+3.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.76%

39.84%

+2.92%

Dividends

PII vs. LCII - Dividend Comparison

PII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, less than LCII's 4.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LCII
LCI Industries
4.79%3.79%4.16%3.34%4.38%2.21%2.16%2.38%3.52%1.58%1.30%3.28%
PII
Polaris Industries Inc.
3.92%4.24%4.58%2.74%2.53%2.29%2.60%2.40%3.13%1.87%2.67%2.47%

Financials

PII vs. LCII - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Polaris Industries Inc. and LCI Industries. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
1.66B
932.70M
(PII) Total Revenue
(LCII) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PII vs. LCII - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Polaris Industries Inc. and LCI Industries over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

16.0%18.0%20.0%22.0%24.0%26.0%28.0%20222023202420252026
20.2%
22.1%
Portfolio components
PII - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Polaris Industries Inc. reported a gross profit of 334.80M and revenue of 1.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.2%.

LCII - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LCI Industries reported a gross profit of 205.91M and revenue of 932.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.1%.

PII - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Polaris Industries Inc. reported an operating income of -55.20M and revenue of 1.66B, resulting in an operating margin of -3.3%.

LCII - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LCI Industries reported an operating income of 35.36M and revenue of 932.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.

PII - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Polaris Industries Inc. reported a net income of -47.40M and revenue of 1.66B, resulting in a net margin of -2.9%.

LCII - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LCI Industries reported a net income of 18.68M and revenue of 932.70M, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PII and LCII have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LCII has higher volatility (14.28%) compared to PII (12.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PII dropped -77.57% vs LCII's -87.55%.

PII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PII and LCII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer