PIGI.L vs. NATP.L
PIGI.L (HANetf Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity UCITS ETF) and NATP.L (HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc GBP) are both exchange-traded funds - PIGI.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while NATP.L is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the EQM Future of Defence Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PIGI.L returned 15.64% vs 20.19% for NATP.L. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PIGI.L charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for NATP.L.
Performance
PIGI.L vs. NATP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIGI.L achieves a 6.14% return, which is significantly lower than NATP.L's 12.33% return.
PIGI.L
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- YTD
- 6.14%
- 6M
- 6.47%
- 1Y
- 15.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NATP.L
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 7.31%
- YTD
- 12.33%
- 6M
- 13.80%
- 1Y
- 20.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PIGI.L vs. NATP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PIGI.L HANetf Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity UCITS ETF | 6.14% | 12.66% |
NATP.L HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc GBP | 12.33% | 20.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between PIGI.L and NATP.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIGI.L vs. NATP.L — Risk / Return Rank
PIGI.L
NATP.L
PIGI.L vs. NATP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity UCITS ETF (PIGI.L) and HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc GBP (NATP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PIGI.L | NATP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.19 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | 1.74 | +0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.80 | 3.88 | +4.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PIGI.L | NATP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 1.04 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.09 | 2.05 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
PIGI.L vs. NATP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIGI.L drawdown since its inception was -6.15%, smaller than the maximum NATP.L drawdown of -11.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIGI.L and NATP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIGI.L | NATP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.15% | -11.66% | +5.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.15% | -11.55% | +5.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -2.70% | +2.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.17% | -2.37% | +1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 5.20% | -3.39% |
Volatility
PIGI.L vs. NATP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HANetf Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity UCITS ETF (PIGI.L) is 1.33%, while HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc GBP (NATP.L) has a volatility of 5.77%. This indicates that PIGI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NATP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PIGI.L | NATP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.33% | 5.77% | -4.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.15% | 15.14% | -8.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.36% | 19.33% | -10.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.46% | 18.36% | -9.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.46% | 18.36% | -9.90% |
PIGI.L vs. NATP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PIGI.L has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than NATP.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
PIGI.L vs. NATP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither PIGI.L nor NATP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PIGI.L and NATP.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NATP.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NATP.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for PIGI.L.
PIGI.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while NATP.L is Aerospace & Defense. PIGI.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while NATP.L tracks EQM Future of Defence Index. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for PIGI.L and 0.49% for NATP.L.
Find the right allocation for PIGI.L and NATP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer