PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NATP.L vs. ASWC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NATP.L vs. ASWC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc GBP (NATP.L) and HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR (ASWC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NATP.L vs. ASWC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NATP.L
HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc GBP
4.07%43.73%34.66%15.89%
ASWC.DE
HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR
3.11%45.49%33.28%15.86%
Different Trading Currencies

NATP.L is traded in GBp, while ASWC.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ASWC.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NATP.L achieves a 4.07% return, which is significantly higher than ASWC.DE's 3.11% return.


NATP.L

1D
1.06%
1M
-2.66%
YTD
4.07%
6M
-1.74%
1Y
30.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ASWC.DE

1D
0.90%
1M
-3.03%
YTD
3.11%
6M
-2.48%
1Y
28.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NATP.L vs. ASWC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NATP.L and ASWC.DE have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Return for Risk

NATP.L vs. ASWC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NATP.L
NATP.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NATP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NATP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
NATP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
NATP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
NATP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

ASWC.DE
ASWC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
ASWC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASWC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASWC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ASWC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASWC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NATP.L vs. ASWC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc GBP (NATP.L) and HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR (ASWC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NATP.LASWC.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.44

1.27

+0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.07

1.88

+0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.24

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

2.48

-0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.20

6.32

-0.13

NATP.L vs. ASWC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NATP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the ASWC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NATP.L and ASWC.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NATP.LASWC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

1.27

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.01

1.93

+0.08

Correlation

The correlation between NATP.L and ASWC.DE is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

NATP.L vs. ASWC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither NATP.L nor ASWC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

NATP.L vs. ASWC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NATP.L drawdown since its inception was -11.66%, roughly equal to the maximum ASWC.DE drawdown of -11.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NATP.L and ASWC.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NATP.LASWC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.66%

-12.58%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.55%

-12.58%

+1.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.46%

-9.55%

+1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.15%

-2.25%

+0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.52%

4.89%

-0.37%

Volatility

NATP.L vs. ASWC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc GBP (NATP.L) is 5.82%, while HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR (ASWC.DE) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that NATP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASWC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NATP.LASWC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.82%

7.35%

-1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.62%

15.11%

-0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.97%

22.12%

-1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.09%

18.43%

-0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.09%

18.43%

-0.34%