PIGI.L vs. BCHN.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PIGI.L (HANetf Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity UCITS ETF) and BCHN.L (Invesco Elwood Global Blockchain Ucits ETF) are both Technology Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, from HANetf and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PIGI.L returned 15.64% vs 62.79% for BCHN.L. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PIGI.L charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BCHN.L.

Performance

PIGI.L vs. BCHN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HANetf Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity UCITS ETF (PIGI.L) and Invesco Elwood Global Blockchain Ucits ETF (BCHN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

PIGI.L is traded in GBp, while BCHN.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BCHN.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIGI.L achieves a 6.14% return, which is significantly lower than BCHN.L's 26.33% return.

PIGI.L

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 2.12%
• YTD: 6.14%
• 6M: 6.47%
• 1Y: 15.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BCHN.L

• 1D: -2.12%
• 1M: 11.59%
• YTD: 26.33%
• 6M: 15.67%
• 1Y: 62.79%
• 3Y*: 42.30%
• 5Y*: 12.56%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIGI.L vs. BCHN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PIGI.L HANetf Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity UCITS ETF	6.14%	12.66%
BCHN.L Invesco Elwood Global Blockchain Ucits ETF	26.33%	61.56%

Correlation

The correlation between PIGI.L and BCHN.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025	0.43

PIGI.L vs. BCHN.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PIGI.L	BCHN.L
Technology	19.1%	32.8%
Healthcare	17.3%	-
Industrials	13.0%	0.7%
Communication Services	11.5%	4.1%
Financial Services	8.6%	53.0%
Consumer Defensive	7.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	6.8%	7.6%
Real Estate	6.1%	-
Basic Materials	5.3%	-
Energy	4.9%	-
Utilities	-	1.8%

Return for Risk

PIGI.L vs. BCHN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIGI.L

PIGI.L Risk / Return Rank: 56
PIGI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
PIGI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
PIGI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 63
PIGI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
PIGI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 52

BCHN.L

BCHN.L Risk / Return Rank: 39
BCHN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
BCHN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
BCHN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 39
BCHN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
BCHN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIGI.L vs. BCHN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity UCITS ETF (PIGI.L) and Invesco Elwood Global Blockchain Ucits ETF (BCHN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PIGI.L	BCHN.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	1.57	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	2.17	+0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.26	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.59	2.04	+0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.80	4.13	+4.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PIGI.L vs. BCHN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIGI.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the BCHN.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIGI.L and BCHN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PIGI.L	BCHN.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.91	1.57	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.34	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.09	0.68	+1.41

Drawdowns

PIGI.L vs. BCHN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIGI.L drawdown since its inception was -6.15%, smaller than the maximum BCHN.L drawdown of -56.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIGI.L and BCHN.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	PIGI.L	BCHN.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.15%	-56.11%	+49.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.15%	-30.67%	+24.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-36.79%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-56.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.33%	-4.33%	+4.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.17%	-20.96%	+19.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.81%	15.16%	-13.35%

Volatility

PIGI.L vs. BCHN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HANetf Digital Infrastructure and Connectivity UCITS ETF (PIGI.L) is 1.33%, while Invesco Elwood Global Blockchain Ucits ETF (BCHN.L) has a volatility of 11.28%. This indicates that PIGI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCHN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PIGI.L	BCHN.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.33%	11.28%	-9.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.15%	25.98%	-19.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.36%	39.80%	-31.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.46%	37.41%	-28.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.46%	35.31%	-26.85%

PIGI.L vs. BCHN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIGI.L has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than BCHN.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

PIGI.L vs. BCHN.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither PIGI.L nor BCHN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PIGI.L and BCHN.L in my portfolio?

PIGI.L and BCHN.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PIGI.L or BCHN.L?

On fees, BCHN.L is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PIGI.L or BCHN.L?

BCHN.L is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for PIGI.L.

What is the main difference between PIGI.L and BCHN.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for PIGI.L and 0.65% for BCHN.L.