PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIFI vs. PAB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PIFI vs. PAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearShares Piton Intermediate Fixed Income ETF (PIFI) and PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF (PAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIFI achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly higher than PAB's -0.37% return.


PIFI

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.55%
6M
-0.17%
YTD
-0.24%
1Y
1.64%
3Y*
3.83%
5Y*
0.88%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.72%

PAB

1D
0.07%
1M
-1.01%
6M
-0.49%
YTD
-0.37%
1Y
2.21%
3Y*
4.46%
5Y*
-0.35%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$365.20K$315.05K$1.07M
$76.55K$61.92K$154.30K

PIFI vs. PAB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PIFI
ClearShares Piton Intermediate Fixed Income ETF
-0.24%6.29%2.52%4.61%-7.15%0.00%
PAB
PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF
-0.37%7.55%1.89%6.37%-14.24%0.90%

Correlation

The correlation between PIFI and PAB is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2021

0.92

The correlation between PIFI and PAB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PIFI vs. PAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PIFI
PIFI Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
PIFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIFI Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
PIFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIFI Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

PAB
PAB Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
PAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAB Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
PAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAB Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PIFI vs. PAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearShares Piton Intermediate Fixed Income ETF (PIFI) and PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF (PAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PIFIPABDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.10

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

0.77

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.92

1.93

-0.01

PIFI vs. PAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIFI Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is comparable to the PAB Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIFI and PAB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PIFI vs. PAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIFI drawdown since its inception was -10.59%, smaller than the maximum PAB drawdown of -19.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIFI and PAB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIFIPABDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.59%

-19.27%

+8.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.93%

-2.86%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.71%

-5.02%

+2.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.25%

-19.24%

+8.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.55%

-2.23%

+0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.18%

-7.64%

+4.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

1.14%

-0.29%

Volatility

PIFI vs. PAB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ClearShares Piton Intermediate Fixed Income ETF (PIFI) is 0.78%, while PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF (PAB) has a volatility of 1.20%. This indicates that PIFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIFIPABDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

1.20%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.05%

3.08%

-1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53%

3.73%

-1.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.69%

6.21%

-2.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.47%

6.10%

-2.63%

PIFI vs. PAB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIFI has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than PAB's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

PIFI vs. PAB - Dividend Comparison

PIFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, less than PAB's 4.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
PAB
PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF
4.65%4.28%4.25%3.70%2.81%2.34%
PIFI
ClearShares Piton Intermediate Fixed Income ETF
4.48%3.16%2.92%2.29%1.22%0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, PIFI and PAB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PAB has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to PIFI (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIFI dropped -10.59% vs PAB's -19.27%.

On 5-year performance, PIFI leads with 0.88% vs -0.35% for PAB. On fees, PAB is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, PIFI has been the lower-risk option at 0.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PIFI has performed better with a 0.88% return vs -0.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PAB is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PIFI.

PAB has the higher dividend yield at 4.65%, compared with 4.48% for PIFI.

They also come from different issuers: ClearShares and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PIFI and 0.19% for PAB.

PIFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PIFI and PAB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer