PIF.TO vs. BEP-UN.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Polaris Infrastructure Inc. (PIF.TO) and Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P (BEP-UN.TO).
Performance
PIF.TO vs. BEP-UN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PIF.TO vs. BEP-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIF.TO Polaris Infrastructure Inc. | 5.55% | -5.26% | 7.55% | -0.45% | -11.82% | -0.90% | 53.07% | 26.92% | -25.73% | 18.19% |
BEP-UN.TO Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P | 23.88% | 20.20% | -0.38% | 6.88% | -21.23% | -14.69% | 79.30% | 84.03% | -12.09% | 18.80% |
Fundamentals
PIF.TO:
CA$257.55M
BEP-UN.TO:
CA$13.02B
PIF.TO:
-CA$0.13
BEP-UN.TO:
CA$0.74
PIF.TO:
3.20
BEP-UN.TO:
2.02
PIF.TO:
1.06
BEP-UN.TO:
3.29
PIF.TO:
CA$80.54M
BEP-UN.TO:
CA$6.43B
PIF.TO:
CA$34.15M
BEP-UN.TO:
CA$2.88B
PIF.TO:
CA$51.40M
BEP-UN.TO:
CA$5.03B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PIF.TO achieves a 5.55% return, which is significantly lower than BEP-UN.TO's 23.88% return. Over the past 10 years, PIF.TO has underperformed BEP-UN.TO with an annualized return of 12.38%, while BEP-UN.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.73% annualized return.
PIF.TO
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 2.17%
- YTD
- 5.55%
- 6M
- -6.80%
- 1Y
- 12.02%
- 3Y*
- 3.71%
- 5Y*
- -5.43%
- 10Y*
- 12.38%
BEP-UN.TO
- 1D
- 2.83%
- 1M
- 4.63%
- YTD
- 23.88%
- 6M
- 29.76%
- 1Y
- 50.61%
- 3Y*
- 7.99%
- 5Y*
- 1.58%
- 10Y*
- 14.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PIF.TO vs. BEP-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
PIF.TO
BEP-UN.TO
PIF.TO vs. BEP-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polaris Infrastructure Inc. (PIF.TO) and Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P (BEP-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PIF.TO | BEP-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.59 | 1.71 | -1.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.92 | 2.35 | -1.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.31 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | 3.18 | -2.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.47 | 7.28 | -5.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PIF.TO | BEP-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 | 1.71 | -1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.19 | 0.05 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.52 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.15 | -0.00 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between PIF.TO and BEP-UN.TO is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PIF.TO vs. BEP-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison
PIF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.78%, more than BEP-UN.TO's 4.63% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIF.TO Polaris Infrastructure Inc. | 6.78% | 7.12% | 6.16% | 6.15% | 6.62% | 4.45% | 4.55% | 6.53% | 24.88% | 3.71% | 2.47% | 0.00% |
BEP-UN.TO Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P | 4.63% | 5.59% | 6.03% | 5.39% | 5.19% | 3.73% | 3.30% | 5.96% | 9.67% | 7.44% | 7.79% | 7.98% |
Drawdowns
PIF.TO vs. BEP-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIF.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, roughly equal to the maximum BEP-UN.TO drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIF.TO and BEP-UN.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PIF.TO | BEP-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -100.00% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.04% | -15.87% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.82% | -43.54% | -2.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.74% | -50.29% | -1.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.69% | -99.97% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.49% | -96.21% | +14.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.83% | 6.94% | +0.89% |
Volatility
PIF.TO vs. BEP-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Polaris Infrastructure Inc. (PIF.TO) is 4.08%, while Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P (BEP-UN.TO) has a volatility of 7.67%. This indicates that PIF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BEP-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PIF.TO | BEP-UN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.08% | 7.67% | -3.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.66% | 19.99% | -6.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.40% | 29.76% | -9.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.79% | 29.43% | -0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.72% | 28.37% | +7.35% |
Financials
PIF.TO vs. BEP-UN.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Polaris Infrastructure Inc. and Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PIF.TO vs. BEP-UN.TO - Profitability Comparison
PIF.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Polaris Infrastructure Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.51M and revenue of 19.81M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.9%.
BEP-UN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P reported a gross profit of 110.68M and revenue of 1.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.1%.
PIF.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Polaris Infrastructure Inc. reported an operating income of 6.55M and revenue of 19.81M, resulting in an operating margin of 33.0%.
BEP-UN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P reported an operating income of 48.74M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.
PIF.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Polaris Infrastructure Inc. reported a net income of 5.91M and revenue of 19.81M, resulting in a net margin of 29.8%.
BEP-UN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P reported a net income of 416.30M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.