BEP-UN.TO vs. BEP

In the year-to-date period, BEP-UN.TO achieves a 5.35% return, which is significantly higher than BEP's 0.54% return. Over the past 10 years, BEP-UN.TO has underperformed BEP with an annualized return of 8.04%, while BEP has yielded a comparatively higher 10.79% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P (BEP-UN.TO) and Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

BEP-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, less than BEP's 5.54% yield.

The maximum BEP-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -74.11%, which is greater than BEP's maximum drawdown of -54.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEP-UN.TO and BEP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P (BEP-UN.TO) and Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) have volatilities of 11.13% and 11.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P and Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.