BEP-UN.TO vs. CNQ.TO

In the year-to-date period, BEP-UN.TO achieves a 9.20% return, which is significantly lower than CNQ.TO's 13.39% return. Over the past 10 years, BEP-UN.TO has underperformed CNQ.TO with an annualized return of 8.47%, while CNQ.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.52% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P (BEP-UN.TO) and Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

BEP-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than CNQ.TO's 2.50% yield.

The maximum BEP-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -74.11%, smaller than the maximum CNQ.TO drawdown of -79.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEP-UN.TO and CNQ.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P (BEP-UN.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.68% compared to Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ.TO) at 7.80%. This indicates that BEP-UN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P and Canadian Natural Resources Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.