PIF.TO vs. PNE.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Polaris Infrastructure Inc. (PIF.TO) and Pine Cliff Energy Ltd. (PNE.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PIF.TO or PNE.TO.
Key characteristics
| PIF.TO | PNE.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -3.23% | -19.73% |
| 1Y Return | -9.03% | -14.81% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -6.85% | 55.58% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 4.07% | 41.42% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -18.51% | -0.88% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.42 | -0.37 |
| Daily Std Dev | 27.28% | 34.58% |
| Max Drawdown | -99.92% | -97.15% |
| Current Drawdown | -99.79% | -41.42% |
Fundamentals
| PIF.TO | PNE.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | CA$265.76M | CA$352.83M |
| EPS | CA$0.76 | CA$0.03 |
| PE Ratio | 16.59 | 33.00 |
| Revenue (TTM) | CA$79.04M | CA$173.04M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$52.62M | CA$171.93M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | CA$57.66M | CA$47.12M |
Correlation
The correlation between PIF.TO and PNE.TO is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
PIF.TO vs. PNE.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PIF.TO achieves a -3.23% return, which is significantly higher than PNE.TO's -19.73% return. Over the past 10 years, PIF.TO has underperformed PNE.TO with an annualized return of -18.51%, while PNE.TO has yielded a comparatively higher -0.88% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PIF.TO vs. PNE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polaris Infrastructure Inc. (PIF.TO) and Pine Cliff Energy Ltd. (PNE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PIF.TO vs. PNE.TO - Dividend Comparison
PIF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.80%, less than PNE.TO's 10.71% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PIF.TO Polaris Infrastructure Inc. | 4.80% | 4.54% | 4.26% | 3.56% | 3.39% | 4.90% | 5.83% | 3.05% | 2.03% |
PNE.TO Pine Cliff Energy Ltd. | 10.71% | 9.63% | 3.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PIF.TO vs. PNE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PIF.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, roughly equal to the maximum PNE.TO drawdown of -97.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIF.TO and PNE.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PIF.TO vs. PNE.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Polaris Infrastructure Inc. (PIF.TO) is 8.39%, while Pine Cliff Energy Ltd. (PNE.TO) has a volatility of 12.54%. This indicates that PIF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PNE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
PIF.TO vs. PNE.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Polaris Infrastructure Inc. and Pine Cliff Energy Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities