PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIEFX vs. COBYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PIEFX vs. COBYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Emerging Markets Equity Fund (PIEFX) and The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIEFX achieves a 42.08% return, which is significantly higher than COBYX's 8.92% return.


PIEFX

1D
0.38%
1M
9.76%
YTD
42.08%
6M
43.50%
1Y
68.99%
3Y*
29.31%
5Y*
7.34%
10Y*

COBYX

1D
-0.42%
1M
-2.39%
YTD
8.92%
6M
8.18%
1Y
14.37%
3Y*
7.28%
5Y*
8.01%
10Y*
4.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIEFX vs. COBYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PIEFX
Federated Hermes Emerging Markets Equity Fund
42.08%36.22%11.90%4.79%-30.60%0.31%49.73%23.04%-22.17%36.82%
COBYX
The Cook & Bynum Fund
8.92%20.50%-10.32%16.73%9.28%9.05%-10.97%9.40%-13.40%8.10%

Correlation

The correlation between PIEFX and COBYX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2017

0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between PIEFX and COBYX has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PIEFX vs. COBYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIEFX
PIEFX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PIEFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIEFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIEFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PIEFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIEFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

COBYX
COBYX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
COBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
COBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
COBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
COBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIEFX vs. COBYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Emerging Markets Equity Fund (PIEFX) and The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PIEFXCOBYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.23

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.67

1.69

+3.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.07

5.43

+13.64

PIEFX vs. COBYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIEFX Sharpe Ratio is 3.46, which is higher than the COBYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIEFX and COBYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PIEFX vs. COBYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIEFX drawdown since its inception was -48.43%, which is greater than COBYX's maximum drawdown of -34.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIEFX and COBYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PIEFXCOBYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.43%

-34.18%

-14.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.67%

-8.95%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.32%

-16.29%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.49%

-17.10%

-29.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.74%

+2.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.10%

-6.78%

-12.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.90%

2.79%

+1.11%

Volatility

PIEFX vs. COBYX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Emerging Markets Equity Fund (PIEFX) has a higher volatility of 10.56% compared to The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX) at 2.98%. This indicates that PIEFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COBYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PIEFXCOBYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.56%

2.98%

+7.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.16%

9.55%

+9.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.42%

11.91%

+10.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.72%

13.99%

+5.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.14%

13.66%

+6.48%

PIEFX vs. COBYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIEFX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than COBYX's 1.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

PIEFX vs. COBYX - Dividend Comparison

PIEFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, more than COBYX's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
COBYX
The Cook & Bynum Fund
1.08%1.18%0.00%1.01%1.16%2.18%0.32%0.69%12.60%1.88%5.09%
PIEFX
Federated Hermes Emerging Markets Equity Fund
1.20%1.70%1.12%0.63%0.99%0.00%0.00%0.42%2.01%0.44%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PIEFX and COBYX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIEFX has higher volatility (10.56%) compared to COBYX (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIEFX dropped -48.43% vs COBYX's -34.18%.

PIEFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.46 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PIEFX and COBYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer