PID vs. SOXQ
PID (Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PID is a Global Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq International Dividend Achievers (NR), while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PID returned 12.52%/yr vs 59.40%/yr for SOXQ. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PID charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.
Performance
PID vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PID achieves a 5.45% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 96.72% return.
PID
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 5.45%
- 6M
- 6.61%
- 1Y
- 16.04%
- 3Y*
- 12.52%
- 5Y*
- 8.28%
- 10Y*
- 8.80%
SOXQ
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 32.12%
- YTD
- 96.72%
- 6M
- 91.61%
- 1Y
- 181.76%
- 3Y*
- 59.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PID vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 5.45% | 24.45% | 3.08% | 14.28% | -6.48% | 3.25% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 96.72% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 24.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between PID and SOXQ is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.46 |
The correlation between PID and SOXQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PID vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PID
SOXQ
Financial Services
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
PID
SOXQ
Utilities
PID
SOXQ
-
Communication Services
PID
SOXQ
-
Energy
PID
SOXQ
-
Technology
PID
SOXQ
Healthcare
PID
SOXQ
-
Industrials
PID
SOXQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
PID
SOXQ
-
Consumer Defensive
PID
SOXQ
-
Basic Materials
PID
SOXQ
-
Real Estate
PID
SOXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PID vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
PID
SOXQ
PID vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PID | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.72 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 11.73 | -9.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.36 | 45.01 | -37.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PID | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 5.43 | -3.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.98 | -0.71 |
Drawdowns
PID vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PID drawdown since its inception was -66.34%, which is greater than SOXQ's maximum drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PID and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PID | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.34% | -46.01% | -20.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.47% | -15.59% | +8.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.34% | -39.36% | +26.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.19% | 0.00% | -2.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.04% | -12.96% | -0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | 4.06% | -1.88% |
Volatility
PID vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) is 2.75%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 13.44%. This indicates that PID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PID | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.75% | 13.44% | -10.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.62% | 26.70% | -19.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.70% | 33.78% | -24.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.97% | 36.38% | -22.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.84% | 36.38% | -18.54% |
PID vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PID has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
PID vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
PID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than SOXQ's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PID Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.88% | 3.31% | 3.30% | 3.30% | 3.16% | 3.99% | 3.87% | 3.46% | 3.90% | 4.48% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.26% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PID and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXQ has higher volatility (13.44%) compared to PID (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PID dropped -66.34% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.
On 3-year performance, SOXQ leads with 59.40% vs 12.52% for PID. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, PID has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 59.40% return vs 12.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PID.
PID has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 0.26% for SOXQ.
PID is categorized as Global Equities, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. PID tracks Nasdaq International Dividend Achievers (NR), while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for PID and 0.19% for SOXQ.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.43 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PID and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer