PICK vs. IWM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PICK (iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PICK is a Materials fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers Ex Gold & Silver Investable Market Index, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PICK returned 17.67%/yr vs 10.93%/yr for IWM. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PICK charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.

Performance

PICK vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PICK achieves a 30.58% return, which is significantly higher than IWM's 17.07% return. Over the past 10 years, PICK has outperformed IWM with an annualized return of 17.67%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively lower 10.93% annualized return.

PICK

• 1D: -2.74%
• 1M: 11.27%
• YTD: 30.58%
• 6M: 38.84%
• 1Y: 88.13%
• 3Y*: 22.92%
• 5Y*: 11.78%
• 10Y*: 17.67%

IWM

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: 3.52%
• YTD: 17.07%
• 6M: 15.83%
• 1Y: 39.10%
• 3Y*: 17.88%
• 5Y*: 6.11%
• 10Y*: 10.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PICK vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PICK iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF	30.58%	51.89%	-16.37%	9.69%	2.54%	22.61%	27.46%	16.47%	-18.65%	38.42%
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	17.07%	12.66%	11.38%	16.83%	-20.48%	14.54%	20.03%	25.39%	-11.12%	14.58%

Correlation

The correlation between PICK and IWM is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2012	0.59

The correlation between PICK and IWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

PICK vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PICK	IWM
Basic Materials	96.6%	4.5%
Industrials	1.1%	17.1%
Technology	1.0%	19.5%
Energy	0.6%	6.0%
Consumer Defensive	0.1%	2.1%
Financial Services	0.1%	15.8%
Communication Services	-	2.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	7.8%
Healthcare	-	15.8%
Real Estate	-	5.7%
Utilities	-	3.0%

Return for Risk

PICK vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PICK

PICK Risk / Return Rank: 84
PICK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
PICK Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
PICK Omega Ratio Rank: 83
PICK Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
PICK Martin Ratio Rank: 85

IWM

IWM Risk / Return Rank: 62
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 53
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PICK vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PICK	IWM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.16	2.05	+1.10
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.63	2.85	+0.78
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.34	+0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.53	3.56	+0.97
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	18.20	12.64	+5.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PICK vs. IWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PICK Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is higher than the IWM Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PICK and IWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PICK	IWM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.16	2.05	+1.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	0.27	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	0.48	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	0.37	-0.15

Drawdowns

PICK vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PICK drawdown since its inception was -68.87%, which is greater than IWM's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PICK and IWM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PICK	IWM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.87%	-59.05%	-9.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.54%	-11.03%	-8.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.52%	-27.50%	-5.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.37%	-31.91%	-4.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.72%	-41.13%	-11.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.74%	-1.49%	-1.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.12%	-10.77%	-13.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.86%	3.10%	+1.76%

Volatility

PICK vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) has a higher volatility of 10.99% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 5.75%. This indicates that PICK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PICK	IWM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.99%	5.75%	+5.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.11%	13.53%	+10.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.10%	19.20%	+8.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.78%	22.52%	+5.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.37%	23.04%	+5.33%

PICK vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PICK has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

PICK vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

PICK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, more than IWM's 0.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	0.88%	1.04%	1.15%	1.35%	1.48%	0.94%	1.04%	1.26%	1.40%	1.26%	1.38%	1.54%
PICK iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF	2.20%	2.88%	3.26%	4.19%	6.93%	5.89%	2.27%	5.51%	4.77%	2.41%	1.15%	15.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PICK and IWM in my portfolio?

PICK and IWM have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PICK or IWM?

PICK has higher volatility (10.99%) compared to IWM (5.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PICK dropped -68.87% vs IWM's -59.05%.

Which ETF is better, PICK or IWM?

On 10-year performance, PICK leads with 17.67% vs 10.93% for IWM. On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IWM has been the lower-risk option at 5.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PICK or IWM?

Over the 10-year period, PICK has performed better with a 17.67% return vs 10.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PICK or IWM?

IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PICK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PICK or IWM?

PICK has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 0.88% for IWM.

What is the main difference between PICK and IWM?

PICK is categorized as Materials, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. PICK tracks MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers Ex Gold & Silver Investable Market Index, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PICK and 0.19% for IWM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PICK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.