PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHYS.TO vs. HXE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHYS.TO vs. HXE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF (HXE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHYS.TO achieves a 2.89% return, which is significantly lower than HXE.TO's 44.48% return.


PHYS.TO

1D
-0.66%
1M
0.26%
YTD
2.89%
6M
3.81%
1Y
32.90%
3Y*
31.40%
5Y*
20.78%
10Y*

HXE.TO

1D
1.90%
1M
0.21%
YTD
44.48%
6M
43.26%
1Y
70.96%
3Y*
28.47%
5Y*
29.94%
10Y*
12.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHYS.TO vs. HXE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PHYS.TO
Sprott Physical Gold Trust
2.89%56.35%37.41%10.65%4.96%-5.37%21.38%12.13%4.21%
HXE.TO
Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF
44.48%17.30%14.39%3.95%53.52%81.48%-33.82%10.05%-21.37%

Correlation

The correlation between PHYS.TO and HXE.TO is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2018

-0.06

The correlation between PHYS.TO and HXE.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.06 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHYS.TO vs. HXE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHYS.TO
PHYS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
PHYS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHYS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHYS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
PHYS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHYS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

HXE.TO
HXE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
HXE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
HXE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHYS.TO vs. HXE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF (HXE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHYS.TOHXE.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.50

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

6.55

-4.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.49

18.78

-14.29

PHYS.TO vs. HXE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHYS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the HXE.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHYS.TO and HXE.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHYS.TOHXE.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

3.07

-1.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.21

1.03

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.22

+0.38

Drawdowns

PHYS.TO vs. HXE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHYS.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.08%, smaller than the maximum HXE.TO drawdown of -85.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYS.TO and HXE.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHYS.TOHXE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.08%

-85.92%

+58.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.14%

-10.88%

-7.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.14%

-25.34%

+7.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.14%

-28.83%

+10.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.29%

-3.75%

-12.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.83%

-30.81%

+22.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.34%

3.79%

+3.55%

Volatility

PHYS.TO vs. HXE.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS.TO) is 5.61%, while Global X S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index Corporate Class ETF (HXE.TO) has a volatility of 9.76%. This indicates that PHYS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HXE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHYS.TOHXE.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.61%

9.76%

-4.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.21%

18.90%

+3.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.13%

23.30%

+2.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.21%

29.24%

-12.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.82%

33.75%

-6.93%

Dividends

PHYS.TO vs. HXE.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither PHYS.TO nor HXE.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PHYS.TO and HXE.TO have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHYS.TO and HXE.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer