PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PHYS.TO vs. ABX.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PHYS.TO and ABX.TO is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

PHYS.TO vs. ABX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS.TO) and Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
86.02%
15.42%
PHYS.TO
ABX.TO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PHYS.TO:

2.73

ABX.TO:

-0.15

Sortino Ratio

PHYS.TO:

3.39

ABX.TO:

0.00

Omega Ratio

PHYS.TO:

1.48

ABX.TO:

1.00

Calmar Ratio

PHYS.TO:

4.58

ABX.TO:

-0.08

Martin Ratio

PHYS.TO:

14.40

ABX.TO:

-0.47

Ulcer Index

PHYS.TO:

2.64%

ABX.TO:

10.28%

Daily Std Dev

PHYS.TO:

13.93%

ABX.TO:

31.73%

Max Drawdown

PHYS.TO:

-27.08%

ABX.TO:

-84.51%

Current Drawdown

PHYS.TO:

-3.62%

ABX.TO:

-49.64%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PHYS.TO:

CA$24.33B

ABX.TO:

CA$40.64B

EPS

PHYS.TO:

CA$0.13

ABX.TO:

CA$1.31

PE Ratio

PHYS.TO:

3.36

ABX.TO:

17.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

PHYS.TO:

CA$2.45B

ABX.TO:

CA$12.34B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PHYS.TO:

CA$2.45B

ABX.TO:

CA$4.23B

EBITDA (TTM)

PHYS.TO:

CA$1.47B

ABX.TO:

CA$5.78B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHYS.TO achieves a 37.65% return, which is significantly higher than ABX.TO's -5.58% return.


PHYS.TO

YTD

37.65%

1M

1.65%

6M

17.48%

1Y

38.04%

5Y*

13.33%

10Y*

N/A

ABX.TO

YTD

-5.58%

1M

-10.87%

6M

-1.27%

1Y

-5.23%

5Y*

1.44%

10Y*

8.22%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PHYS.TO vs. ABX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS.TO) and Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PHYS.TO, currently valued at 1.83, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.83-0.34
The chart of Sortino ratio for PHYS.TO, currently valued at 2.33, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.33-0.27
The chart of Omega ratio for PHYS.TO, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.310.97
The chart of Calmar ratio for PHYS.TO, currently valued at 3.04, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.04-0.23
The chart of Martin ratio for PHYS.TO, currently valued at 9.13, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.009.13-0.99
PHYS.TO
ABX.TO

The current PHYS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the ABX.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHYS.TO and ABX.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.83
-0.34
PHYS.TO
ABX.TO

Dividends

PHYS.TO vs. ABX.TO - Dividend Comparison

PHYS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ABX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
PHYS.TO
Sprott Physical Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ABX.TO
Barrick Gold Corporation
1.80%1.67%2.80%3.24%1.07%0.81%1.22%1.02%0.59%1.69%2.16%3.04%

Drawdowns

PHYS.TO vs. ABX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHYS.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.08%, smaller than the maximum ABX.TO drawdown of -84.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYS.TO and ABX.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-6.78%
-44.25%
PHYS.TO
ABX.TO

Volatility

PHYS.TO vs. ABX.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS.TO) is 5.44%, while Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX.TO) has a volatility of 8.89%. This indicates that PHYS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
5.44%
8.89%
PHYS.TO
ABX.TO

Financials

PHYS.TO vs. ABX.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sprott Physical Gold Trust and Barrick Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in CAD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab