PHYS.TO vs. KILO.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS.TO) and Purpose Gold Bullion Fund (KILO.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PHYS.TO or KILO.TO.
Correlation
The correlation between PHYS.TO and KILO.TO is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
PHYS.TO vs. KILO.TO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PHYS.TO:
2.66
KILO.TO:
1.72
PHYS.TO:
3.32
KILO.TO:
2.27
PHYS.TO:
1.47
KILO.TO:
1.31
PHYS.TO:
4.47
KILO.TO:
3.20
PHYS.TO:
13.92
KILO.TO:
8.74
PHYS.TO:
2.66%
KILO.TO:
2.96%
PHYS.TO:
13.95%
KILO.TO:
15.08%
PHYS.TO:
-27.08%
KILO.TO:
-22.67%
PHYS.TO:
-3.98%
KILO.TO:
-6.48%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHYS.TO achieves a 37.13% return, which is significantly higher than KILO.TO's 25.41% return.
PHYS.TO
37.13%
-0.75%
17.37%
37.06%
12.88%
N/A
KILO.TO
25.41%
-3.63%
11.81%
25.91%
10.77%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PHYS.TO vs. KILO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS.TO) and Purpose Gold Bullion Fund (KILO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PHYS.TO vs. KILO.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither PHYS.TO nor KILO.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHYS.TO Sprott Physical Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KILO.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.41% |
Drawdowns
PHYS.TO vs. KILO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHYS.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.08%, which is greater than KILO.TO's maximum drawdown of -22.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYS.TO and KILO.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PHYS.TO vs. KILO.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS.TO) is 4.11%, while Purpose Gold Bullion Fund (KILO.TO) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that PHYS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KILO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.