PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHYQX vs. FRFZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHYQX vs. FRFZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM High Yield Fund Class R6 (PHYQX) and PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund (FRFZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHYQX achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly lower than FRFZX's 2.29% return. Over the past 10 years, PHYQX has outperformed FRFZX with an annualized return of 5.85%, while FRFZX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.36% annualized return.


PHYQX

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.18%
YTD
1.64%
6M
2.14%
1Y
7.31%
3Y*
9.23%
5Y*
4.09%
10Y*
5.85%

FRFZX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.54%
YTD
2.29%
6M
2.95%
1Y
6.22%
3Y*
8.74%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*
5.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHYQX vs. FRFZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PHYQX
PGIM High Yield Fund Class R6
1.64%9.18%8.55%12.34%-12.22%5.99%5.79%16.29%-1.18%7.74%
FRFZX
PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund
2.29%5.66%9.45%14.11%-3.56%5.46%4.62%7.47%-0.13%4.48%

Correlation

The correlation between PHYQX and FRFZX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2011

0.53

The correlation between PHYQX and FRFZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHYQX vs. FRFZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHYQX
PHYQX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PHYQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHYQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHYQX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PHYQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHYQX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

FRFZX
FRFZX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FRFZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRFZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRFZX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FRFZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRFZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHYQX vs. FRFZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM High Yield Fund Class R6 (PHYQX) and PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund (FRFZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHYQXFRFZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

2.02

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

7.34

-4.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.70

22.93

-9.22

PHYQX vs. FRFZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHYQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the FRFZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHYQX and FRFZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHYQXFRFZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

2.69

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

1.89

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.07

1.35

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.14

1.41

-0.27

Drawdowns

PHYQX vs. FRFZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHYQX drawdown since its inception was -21.12%, roughly equal to the maximum FRFZX drawdown of -21.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYQX and FRFZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHYQXFRFZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.12%

-21.95%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.47%

-0.85%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.76%

-3.12%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.05%

-7.85%

-8.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.12%

-21.95%

+0.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

0.00%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.23%

-0.91%

-1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

0.27%

+0.28%

Volatility

PHYQX vs. FRFZX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM High Yield Fund Class R6 (PHYQX) has a higher volatility of 1.24% compared to PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund (FRFZX) at 0.59%. This indicates that PHYQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRFZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHYQXFRFZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.24%

0.59%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.83%

1.59%

+1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.59%

2.33%

+1.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.11%

3.09%

+2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.49%

3.97%

+1.52%

PHYQX vs. FRFZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHYQX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FRFZX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHYQX vs. FRFZX - Dividend Comparison

PHYQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.11%, less than FRFZX's 7.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRFZX
PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund
7.40%7.65%8.76%8.87%6.41%3.33%5.35%5.42%5.06%4.90%4.34%3.97%
PHYQX
PGIM High Yield Fund Class R6
7.11%7.07%7.53%7.09%6.29%6.23%6.56%6.32%6.64%6.38%4.88%7.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHYQX and FRFZX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PHYQX has higher volatility (1.24%) compared to FRFZX (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHYQX dropped -21.12% vs FRFZX's -21.95%.

FRFZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHYQX and FRFZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer