PHYQX vs. DFAPX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PHYQX (PGIM High Yield Fund Class R6) and DFAPX (DFA Investment Grade Portfolio) are both mutual funds - PHYQX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by PGIM, while DFAPX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Dimensional. Over the past 10 years, PHYQX returned 5.87%/yr vs 2.03%/yr for DFAPX. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PHYQX charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for DFAPX.

Performance

PHYQX vs. DFAPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM High Yield Fund Class R6 (PHYQX) and DFA Investment Grade Portfolio (DFAPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHYQX achieves a 1.85% return, which is significantly higher than DFAPX's 0.65% return. Over the past 10 years, PHYQX has outperformed DFAPX with an annualized return of 5.87%, while DFAPX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.03% annualized return.

PHYQX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 1.85%
• 6M: 2.35%
• 1Y: 7.76%
• 3Y*: 9.30%
• 5Y*: 4.13%
• 10Y*: 5.87%

DFAPX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: 0.65%
• 6M: 0.43%
• 1Y: 5.47%
• 3Y*: 4.56%
• 5Y*: 0.63%
• 10Y*: 2.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHYQX vs. DFAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PHYQX PGIM High Yield Fund Class R6	1.85%	9.18%	8.55%	12.34%	-12.22%	5.99%	5.79%	16.29%	-1.18%	7.74%
DFAPX DFA Investment Grade Portfolio	0.65%	7.22%	1.81%	6.84%	-12.92%	-1.57%	9.19%	9.97%	-0.24%	3.37%

Correlation

The correlation between PHYQX and DFAPX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012	0.21

Over the past year, PHYQX and DFAPX have become more correlated (0.57) than their long-term average of 0.21, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

PHYQX vs. DFAPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHYQX

PHYQX Risk / Return Rank: 75
PHYQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
PHYQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
PHYQX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
PHYQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
PHYQX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

DFAPX

DFAPX Risk / Return Rank: 27
DFAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
DFAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
DFAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
DFAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
DFAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHYQX vs. DFAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM High Yield Fund Class R6 (PHYQX) and DFA Investment Grade Portfolio (DFAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PHYQX	DFAPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	1.45	+0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.04	2.19	+1.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.26	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.24	2.12	+1.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.54	6.04	+8.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PHYQX vs. DFAPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHYQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the DFAPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHYQX and DFAPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PHYQX	DFAPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.24	1.45	+0.79
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	0.11	+0.70
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.07	0.42	+0.66
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.14	0.49	+0.65

Drawdowns

PHYQX vs. DFAPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHYQX drawdown since its inception was -21.12%, which is greater than DFAPX's maximum drawdown of -18.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYQX and DFAPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PHYQX	DFAPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.12%	-18.30%	-2.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.47%	-2.66%	+0.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.76%	-4.74%	+0.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.05%	-18.22%	+2.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.12%	-18.30%	-2.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.21%	-1.20%	+0.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.23%	-3.47%	+1.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.55%	0.93%	-0.38%

Volatility

PHYQX vs. DFAPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM High Yield Fund Class R6 (PHYQX) is 1.24%, while DFA Investment Grade Portfolio (DFAPX) has a volatility of 1.32%. This indicates that PHYQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PHYQX	DFAPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.24%	1.32%	-0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.83%	2.72%	+0.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.59%	3.90%	-0.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.10%	5.82%	-0.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.49%	4.88%	+0.61%

PHYQX vs. DFAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHYQX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAPX's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

PHYQX vs. DFAPX - Dividend Comparison

PHYQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.09%, more than DFAPX's 3.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFAPX DFA Investment Grade Portfolio	3.74%	3.78%	3.79%	3.31%	2.62%	3.31%	2.14%	2.59%	2.67%	2.21%	2.12%	2.45%
PHYQX PGIM High Yield Fund Class R6	7.09%	7.07%	7.53%	7.09%	6.29%	6.23%	6.56%	6.32%	6.64%	6.38%	4.88%	7.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PHYQX and DFAPX in my portfolio?

PHYQX and DFAPX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PHYQX or DFAPX?

DFAPX has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to PHYQX (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHYQX dropped -21.12% vs DFAPX's -18.30%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PHYQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.