PHVS vs. ALMS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Pharvaris N.V. (PHVS) and Alumis Inc (ALMS).

Performance

PHVS vs. ALMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pharvaris N.V. (PHVS) and Alumis Inc (ALMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PHVS vs. ALMS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PHVS Pharvaris N.V.	1.80%	44.76%	1.97%
ALMS Alumis Inc	125.72%	24.17%	-40.90%

Fundamentals

EPS PHVS : -$2.84 ALMS : -$2.71
Total Revenue (TTM) PHVS : $0.00 ALMS : $22.12M
Gross Profit (TTM) PHVS : -$97.02K ALMS : $21.30M
EBITDA (TTM) PHVS : -$155.20M ALMS : -$424.43M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHVS achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly lower than ALMS's 125.72% return.

PHVS

• 1D: 3.52%
• 1M: -0.49%
• YTD: 1.80%
• 6M: 13.23%
• 1Y: 79.94%
• 3Y*: 51.93%
• 5Y*: 0.21%
• 10Y*: —

ALMS

• 1D: 9.01%
• 1M: -25.80%
• YTD: 125.72%
• 6M: 452.13%
• 1Y: 258.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PHVS vs. ALMS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHVS

PHVS Risk / Return Rank: 81
PHVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
PHVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
PHVS Omega Ratio Rank: 74
PHVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
PHVS Martin Ratio Rank: 83

ALMS

ALMS Risk / Return Rank: 89
ALMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
ALMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
ALMS Omega Ratio Rank: 92
ALMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
ALMS Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHVS vs. ALMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pharvaris N.V. (PHVS) and Alumis Inc (ALMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PHVS	ALMS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	1.84	-0.65
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.10	3.28	-1.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.43	-0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.20	4.03	-0.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.27	6.31	+0.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PHVS vs. ALMS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHVS Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the ALMS Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHVS and ALMS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PHVS	ALMS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.20	1.84	-0.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.00	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.00	0.28	-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between PHVS and ALMS is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PHVS vs. ALMS - Dividend Comparison

Neither PHVS nor ALMS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PHVS vs. ALMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHVS drawdown since its inception was -95.06%, which is greater than ALMS's maximum drawdown of -78.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHVS and ALMS.

Drawdown Indicators

	PHVS	ALMS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.06%	-78.95%	-16.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.93%	-72.19%	+50.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-93.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.57%	-26.52%	-3.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.83%	-39.76%	-14.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.84%	46.03%	-35.19%

Volatility

PHVS vs. ALMS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pharvaris N.V. (PHVS) is 14.30%, while Alumis Inc (ALMS) has a volatility of 29.29%. This indicates that PHVS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PHVS	ALMS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.30%	29.29%	-14.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.14%	89.40%	-46.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.19%	141.57%	-74.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	177.81%	121.37%	+56.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	176.41%	121.37%	+55.04%

Financials