PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHVS vs. ALMS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PHVS vs. ALMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pharvaris N.V. (PHVS) and Alumis Inc (ALMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHVS achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly lower than ALMS's 105.74% return.


PHVS

1D
4.00%
1M
0.40%
YTD
8.61%
6M
2.64%
1Y
74.42%
3Y*
51.60%
5Y*
8.09%
10Y*

ALMS

1D
0.20%
1M
-20.48%
YTD
105.74%
6M
156.12%
1Y
482.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHVS vs. ALMS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PHVS
Pharvaris N.V.
8.61%44.76%1.97%
ALMS
Alumis Inc
105.74%24.17%-40.90%

Correlation

The correlation between PHVS and ALMS is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2024

0.13

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PHVS:

$1.78B

ALMS:

$2.51B

EPS

PHVS:

-$2.99

ALMS:

-$2.31

PB Ratio

PHVS:

6.57

ALMS:

4.43

Total Revenue (TTM)

PHVS:

$0.00

ALMS:

$8.40M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PHVS:

$0.00

ALMS:

$5.79M

EBITDA (TTM)

PHVS:

-$167.06M

ALMS:

-$411.89M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Pharvaris N.V.

Alumis Inc

Return for Risk

PHVS vs. ALMS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHVS
PHVS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PHVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHVS Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
PHVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHVS Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

ALMS
ALMS Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
ALMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALMS Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ALMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALMS Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHVS vs. ALMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pharvaris N.V. (PHVS) and Alumis Inc (ALMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHVSALMSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.16

4.01

-2.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.08

5.49

-3.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.68

-0.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

14.66

-11.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.60

37.24

-29.63

PHVS vs. ALMS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHVS Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the ALMS Sharpe Ratio of 4.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHVS and ALMS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHVSALMSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

4.01

-2.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

0.21

-0.20

Drawdowns

PHVS vs. ALMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHVS drawdown since its inception was -95.06%, which is greater than ALMS's maximum drawdown of -78.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHVS and ALMS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHVSALMSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.06%

-78.95%

-16.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.93%

-33.16%

+11.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.86%

-33.02%

+8.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.94%

-38.16%

-14.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.83%

13.03%

-3.20%

Volatility

PHVS vs. ALMS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pharvaris N.V. (PHVS) is 14.03%, while Alumis Inc (ALMS) has a volatility of 16.64%. This indicates that PHVS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHVSALMSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.03%

16.64%

-2.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.76%

89.27%

-48.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.41%

121.24%

-56.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

177.74%

116.89%

+60.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

173.73%

116.89%

+56.84%

Dividends

PHVS vs. ALMS - Dividend Comparison

Neither PHVS nor ALMS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

PHVS vs. ALMS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pharvaris N.V. and Alumis Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00M10.00M15.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
1.74M
(PHVS) Total Revenue
(ALMS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PHVS and ALMS have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALMS has higher volatility (16.64%) compared to PHVS (14.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHVS dropped -95.06% vs ALMS's -78.95%.

ALMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.01 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHVS and ALMS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer