PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHTYX vs. SSFNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHTYX vs. SSFNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund (PHTYX) and State Street Target Retirement Fund (SSFNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHTYX achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly higher than SSFNX's 5.40% return. Over the past 10 years, PHTYX has outperformed SSFNX with an annualized return of 11.21%, while SSFNX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.87% annualized return.


PHTYX

1D
0.58%
1M
4.14%
YTD
10.01%
6M
10.88%
1Y
25.44%
3Y*
18.38%
5Y*
9.48%
10Y*
11.21%

SSFNX

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.19%
YTD
5.40%
6M
5.73%
1Y
12.90%
3Y*
9.87%
5Y*
4.47%
10Y*
5.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHTYX vs. SSFNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PHTYX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund
10.01%18.54%16.13%19.35%-18.26%18.37%15.78%24.79%-9.07%19.81%
SSFNX
State Street Target Retirement Fund
5.40%10.93%7.05%10.73%-12.21%6.87%10.26%13.97%-2.49%8.92%

Correlation

The correlation between PHTYX and SSFNX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014

0.90

The correlation between PHTYX and SSFNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHTYX vs. SSFNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHTYX
PHTYX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PHTYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHTYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHTYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
PHTYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHTYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SSFNX
SSFNX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SSFNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSFNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSFNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SSFNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSFNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHTYX vs. SSFNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund (PHTYX) and State Street Target Retirement Fund (SSFNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHTYXSSFNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.40

3.00

-0.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.35

4.41

-1.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.62

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

3.75

-0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.94

17.09

-2.15

PHTYX vs. SSFNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHTYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the SSFNX Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHTYX and SSFNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHTYXSSFNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

3.00

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.68

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.90

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.84

-0.14

Drawdowns

PHTYX vs. SSFNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHTYX drawdown since its inception was -30.61%, which is greater than SSFNX's maximum drawdown of -16.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHTYX and SSFNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHTYXSSFNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.61%

-16.62%

-13.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.95%

-3.52%

-4.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.25%

-5.40%

-9.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.94%

-16.62%

-8.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.61%

-16.62%

-13.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.08%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.57%

-2.52%

-2.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

0.77%

+0.96%

Volatility

PHTYX vs. SSFNX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund (PHTYX) has a higher volatility of 3.20% compared to State Street Target Retirement Fund (SSFNX) at 1.40%. This indicates that PHTYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSFNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHTYXSSFNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.20%

1.40%

+1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.68%

3.54%

+5.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.92%

4.39%

+6.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.56%

6.58%

+7.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.81%

6.57%

+8.24%

PHTYX vs. SSFNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHTYX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SSFNX's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PHTYX vs. SSFNX - Dividend Comparison

PHTYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, less than SSFNX's 4.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PHTYX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund
4.49%4.94%4.41%3.05%9.68%4.72%3.45%3.63%4.66%2.24%2.00%1.66%
SSFNX
State Street Target Retirement Fund
4.61%4.86%5.78%5.26%5.12%6.69%1.61%3.35%4.40%2.72%1.84%2.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHTYX and SSFNX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PHTYX has higher volatility (3.20%) compared to SSFNX (1.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHTYX dropped -30.61% vs SSFNX's -16.62%.

SSFNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHTYX and SSFNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer