PHTYX vs. PSSMX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

PHTYX (Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund) and PSSMX (Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index Fund) are both mutual funds - PHTYX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Principal, while PSSMX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Principal. Over the past 10 years, PHTYX returned 10.79%/yr vs 10.79%/yr for PSSMX. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PHTYX charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for PSSMX.

Performance

PHTYX vs. PSSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund (PHTYX) and Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index Fund (PSSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHTYX achieves a 9.09% return, which is significantly lower than PSSMX's 21.15% return. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: PHTYX at 10.79% and PSSMX at 10.79%.

PHTYX

• 1D: 1.61%
• 1M: 0.05%
• 6M: 6.22%
• YTD: 9.09%
• 1Y: 20.03%
• 3Y*: 15.81%
• 5Y*: 9.01%
• 10Y*: 10.79%
• ALL TIME*: 10.03%

PSSMX

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: -0.64%
• 6M: 14.80%
• YTD: 21.15%
• 1Y: 35.09%
• 3Y*: 15.43%
• 5Y*: 8.35%
• 10Y*: 10.79%
• ALL TIME*: 9.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PHTYX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PSSMX Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

PHTYX vs. PSSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PHTYX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund	9.09%	18.54%	16.13%	19.35%	-18.26%	18.37%	15.78%	24.79%	-9.07%	19.81%
PSSMX Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index Fund	21.15%	5.34%	16.60%	15.18%	-16.69%	25.39%	10.65%	21.99%	-9.42%	12.46%

Correlation

The correlation between PHTYX and PSSMX is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2014	0.84

The correlation between PHTYX and PSSMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PHTYX vs. PSSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PHTYX

PHTYX Risk / Return Rank: 66
PHTYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
PHTYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
PHTYX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
PHTYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
PHTYX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

PSSMX

PSSMX Risk / Return Rank: 82
PSSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
PSSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
PSSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
PSSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
PSSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PHTYX vs. PSSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund (PHTYX) and Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index Fund (PSSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PHTYX	PSSMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	1.81	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.15	2.68	-0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.32	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.30	3.59	-1.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.86	12.27	-2.41

PHTYX vs. PSSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHTYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the PSSMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHTYX and PSSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PHTYX vs. PSSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHTYX drawdown since its inception was -30.61%, smaller than the maximum PSSMX drawdown of -58.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHTYX and PSSMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PHTYX	PSSMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.61%	-58.43%	+27.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.95%	-8.76%	+0.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.25%	-24.30%	+9.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.94%	-27.01%	+2.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.61%	-44.85%	+14.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.25%	-1.87%	+0.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.53%	-9.47%	+4.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.85%	2.57%	-0.72%

Volatility

PHTYX vs. PSSMX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund (PHTYX) and Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index Fund (PSSMX) have volatilities of 3.33% and 3.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PHTYX	PSSMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.33%	3.47%	-0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.95%	11.69%	-1.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.02%	17.41%	-5.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.69%	21.62%	-6.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.79%	22.86%	-8.07%

PHTYX vs. PSSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHTYX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than PSSMX's 0.73% expense ratio.

Dividends

PHTYX vs. PSSMX - Dividend Comparison

PHTYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, less than PSSMX's 8.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PHTYX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund	4.52%	4.94%	4.41%	3.05%	9.68%	4.72%	3.45%	3.63%	4.66%	2.24%	2.00%	1.66%
PSSMX Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index Fund	8.24%	9.98%	15.91%	3.75%	10.45%	8.23%	1.67%	6.56%	13.08%	6.03%	6.15%	8.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PHTYX and PSSMX in my portfolio?

PHTYX and PSSMX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PHTYX or PSSMX?

PSSMX has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to PHTYX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHTYX dropped -30.61% vs PSSMX's -58.43%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.