PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHTYX vs. PLGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHTYX vs. PLGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund (PHTYX) and Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I (PLGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHTYX achieves a 9.55% return, which is significantly higher than PLGIX's 1.06% return. Over the past 10 years, PHTYX has underperformed PLGIX with an annualized return of 11.53%, while PLGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.21% annualized return.


PHTYX

1D
-0.26%
1M
1.44%
YTD
9.55%
6M
8.94%
1Y
23.52%
3Y*
17.97%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
11.53%

PLGIX

1D
-1.16%
1M
-1.64%
YTD
1.06%
6M
0.06%
1Y
9.52%
3Y*
32.49%
5Y*
15.43%
10Y*
20.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHTYX vs. PLGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PHTYX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund
9.55%18.54%16.13%19.35%-18.26%18.37%15.78%24.79%-9.07%19.81%
PLGIX
Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I
1.06%11.59%83.01%40.40%-34.05%21.49%36.06%34.89%3.44%33.67%

Correlation

The correlation between PHTYX and PLGIX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2014

0.88

The correlation between PHTYX and PLGIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHTYX vs. PLGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHTYX
PHTYX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
PHTYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHTYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHTYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PHTYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHTYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

PLGIX
PLGIX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
PLGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
PLGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHTYX vs. PLGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund (PHTYX) and Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I (PLGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PHTYXPLGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.12

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

0.58

+2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.78

1.76

+12.02

PHTYX vs. PLGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHTYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the PLGIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHTYX and PLGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PHTYX vs. PLGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHTYX drawdown since its inception was -30.61%, smaller than the maximum PLGIX drawdown of -55.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHTYX and PLGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHTYXPLGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.61%

-55.43%

+24.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.95%

-18.32%

+10.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.25%

-21.39%

+6.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.94%

-40.63%

+15.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.61%

-40.63%

+10.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-5.04%

+4.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.56%

-13.24%

+8.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

6.00%

-4.22%

Volatility

PHTYX vs. PLGIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund (PHTYX) is 4.68%, while Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I (PLGIX) has a volatility of 6.19%. This indicates that PHTYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHTYXPLGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

6.19%

-1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.61%

13.10%

-3.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.65%

16.12%

-4.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.66%

30.21%

-15.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.85%

25.50%

-10.65%

PHTYX vs. PLGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHTYX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than PLGIX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHTYX vs. PLGIX - Dividend Comparison

PHTYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, less than PLGIX's 14.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PHTYX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2045 Fund
4.51%4.94%4.41%3.05%9.68%4.72%3.45%3.63%4.66%2.24%2.00%1.66%
PLGIX
Principal LargeCap Growth Fund I
14.30%14.45%63.77%5.99%11.57%11.34%7.03%8.01%16.41%7.05%4.64%12.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHTYX and PLGIX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLGIX has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to PHTYX (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHTYX dropped -30.61% vs PLGIX's -55.43%.

PHTYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHTYX and PLGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer