PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHTQX vs. FIRMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHTQX vs. FIRMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2025 Fund (PHTQX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund (FIRMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PHTQX

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.14%
6M
3.30%
YTD
5.26%
1Y
12.17%
3Y*
10.73%
5Y*
5.30%
10Y*
7.61%
ALL TIME*
7.21%

FIRMX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PHTQX vs. FIRMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PHTQX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2025 Fund
5.26%13.11%9.88%13.23%-15.18%11.94%13.62%19.24%-6.54%15.23%
FIRMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund
3.60%9.95%4.29%8.07%-11.66%2.77%8.57%10.57%-1.80%7.08%

Correlation

The correlation between PHTQX and FIRMX is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2014

0.84

The correlation between PHTQX and FIRMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHTQX vs. FIRMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PHTQX
PHTQX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PHTQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHTQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHTQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PHTQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHTQX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FIRMX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PHTQX vs. FIRMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2025 Fund (PHTQX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund (FIRMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PHTQXFIRMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.85

PHTQX vs. FIRMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PHTQX vs. FIRMX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHTQXFIRMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.20%

Volatility

PHTQX vs. FIRMX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHTQXFIRMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.77%

PHTQX vs. FIRMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHTQX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FIRMX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHTQX vs. FIRMX - Dividend Comparison

PHTQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than FIRMX's 2.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIRMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund
2.81%3.13%3.02%2.81%4.54%3.56%2.48%2.59%4.65%8.57%1.67%1.68%
PHTQX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2025 Fund
4.68%4.92%3.90%3.52%6.72%5.24%4.32%3.33%3.41%2.33%1.90%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHTQX and FIRMX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHTQX and FIRMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer