PHTQX vs. FQIFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PHTQX (Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2025 Fund) and FQIFX (Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Investor Class) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, PHTQX returned 7.93%/yr vs 8.00%/yr for FQIFX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PHTQX charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for FQIFX.

Performance

PHTQX vs. FQIFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2025 Fund (PHTQX) and Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Investor Class (FQIFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHTQX achieves a 6.14% return, which is significantly lower than FQIFX's 7.23% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PHTQX having a 7.93% annualized return and FQIFX not far ahead at 8.00%.

PHTQX

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 2.91%
• YTD: 6.14%
• 6M: 6.39%
• 1Y: 16.12%
• 3Y*: 12.11%
• 5Y*: 5.83%
• 10Y*: 7.93%

FQIFX

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 3.27%
• YTD: 7.23%
• 6M: 7.55%
• 1Y: 17.89%
• 3Y*: 12.56%
• 5Y*: 5.74%
• 10Y*: 8.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHTQX vs. FQIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PHTQX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2025 Fund	6.14%	13.11%	9.88%	13.23%	-15.18%	11.94%	13.62%	19.24%	-6.54%	15.23%
FQIFX Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Investor Class	7.23%	14.84%	8.49%	13.88%	-16.54%	9.52%	13.56%	19.63%	-4.51%	15.15%

Correlation

The correlation between PHTQX and FQIFX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015	0.97

The correlation between PHTQX and FQIFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PHTQX vs. FQIFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHTQX

PHTQX Risk / Return Rank: 71
PHTQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
PHTQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
PHTQX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
PHTQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
PHTQX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

FQIFX

FQIFX Risk / Return Rank: 69
FQIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FQIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FQIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
FQIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
FQIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHTQX vs. FQIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2025 Fund (PHTQX) and Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Investor Class (FQIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PHTQX	FQIFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.42	2.47	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.51	3.53	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.47	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.22	3.02	+0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.43	13.31	+1.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PHTQX vs. FQIFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHTQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the FQIFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHTQX and FQIFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PHTQX	FQIFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.42	2.47	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.60	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	0.81	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.73	+0.01

Drawdowns

PHTQX vs. FQIFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHTQX drawdown since its inception was -21.90%, roughly equal to the maximum FQIFX drawdown of -22.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHTQX and FQIFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PHTQX	FQIFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.90%	-22.66%	+0.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.11%	-5.98%	+0.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.41%	-8.59%	+0.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.08%	-22.66%	+2.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.90%	-22.66%	+0.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.58%	-3.87%	+0.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.14%	1.35%	-0.21%

Volatility

PHTQX vs. FQIFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2025 Fund (PHTQX) is 2.21%, while Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Investor Class (FQIFX) has a volatility of 2.46%. This indicates that PHTQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PHTQX	FQIFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.21%	2.46%	-0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.49%	5.97%	-0.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.79%	7.30%	-0.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.10%	9.55%	-0.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.81%	9.90%	-0.09%

PHTQX vs. FQIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHTQX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FQIFX's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

PHTQX vs. FQIFX - Dividend Comparison

PHTQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, more than FQIFX's 4.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FQIFX Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Investor Class	4.31%	4.92%	3.36%	2.37%	2.64%	2.10%	2.38%	13.76%	2.31%	1.83%	1.88%	1.93%
PHTQX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2025 Fund	4.64%	4.92%	3.90%	3.52%	6.72%	5.24%	4.32%	3.33%	3.41%	2.33%	1.90%	1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PHTQX and FQIFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, PHTQX and FQIFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PHTQX or FQIFX?

FQIFX has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to PHTQX (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHTQX dropped -21.90% vs FQIFX's -22.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FQIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.