PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHTJX vs. PCBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHTJX vs. PCBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund (PHTJX) and Principal MidCap Fund Institutional Class (PCBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHTJX achieves a 7.73% return, which is significantly higher than PCBIX's -6.84% return. Over the past 10 years, PHTJX has underperformed PCBIX with an annualized return of 9.60%, while PCBIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.92% annualized return.


PHTJX

1D
0.42%
1M
3.15%
YTD
7.73%
6M
8.33%
1Y
20.31%
3Y*
14.95%
5Y*
7.34%
10Y*
9.60%

PCBIX

1D
0.33%
1M
1.42%
YTD
-6.84%
6M
-6.71%
1Y
-7.76%
3Y*
10.43%
5Y*
5.18%
10Y*
11.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHTJX vs. PCBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PHTJX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund
7.73%15.57%12.67%16.45%-17.37%15.57%15.13%22.69%-8.00%18.13%
PCBIX
Principal MidCap Fund Institutional Class
-6.84%1.62%23.63%25.92%-23.16%25.22%18.25%49.40%-6.86%25.32%

Correlation

The correlation between PHTJX and PCBIX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014

0.89

The correlation between PHTJX and PCBIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHTJX vs. PCBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHTJX
PHTJX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PHTJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHTJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHTJX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
PHTJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHTJX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

PCBIX
PCBIX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
PCBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
PCBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHTJX vs. PCBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund (PHTJX) and Principal MidCap Fund Institutional Class (PCBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHTJXPCBIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.40

-0.56

+2.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.41

-0.71

+4.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

0.92

+0.53

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

-0.40

+3.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.50

-0.89

+15.39

PHTJX vs. PCBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHTJX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the PCBIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHTJX and PCBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHTJXPCBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

-0.56

+2.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.28

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.62

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.60

+0.11

Drawdowns

PHTJX vs. PCBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHTJX drawdown since its inception was -27.17%, smaller than the maximum PCBIX drawdown of -50.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHTJX and PCBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHTJXPCBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.17%

-50.25%

+23.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-19.29%

+12.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.58%

-19.29%

+7.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.12%

-31.17%

+8.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.17%

-40.56%

+13.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-12.93%

+12.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-6.55%

+2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.42%

8.62%

-7.20%

Volatility

PHTJX vs. PCBIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund (PHTJX) is 2.70%, while Principal MidCap Fund Institutional Class (PCBIX) has a volatility of 4.04%. This indicates that PHTJX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHTJXPCBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

4.04%

-1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.94%

11.12%

-4.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.67%

14.23%

-5.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.79%

18.63%

-6.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.51%

19.15%

-6.64%

PHTJX vs. PCBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHTJX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than PCBIX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHTJX vs. PCBIX - Dividend Comparison

PHTJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, less than PCBIX's 6.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PCBIX
Principal MidCap Fund Institutional Class
6.24%5.81%6.40%2.51%3.18%7.96%1.08%9.02%12.24%3.31%2.49%6.30%
PHTJX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund
4.35%4.68%4.09%3.37%8.44%4.96%3.98%3.71%4.01%2.31%1.99%1.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHTJX and PCBIX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCBIX has higher volatility (4.04%) compared to PHTJX (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHTJX dropped -27.17% vs PCBIX's -50.25%.

PHTJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHTJX and PCBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer