PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHSTX vs. PDFDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHSTX vs. PDFDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Global Health Care Fund (PHSTX) and Perkins Discovery Fund (PDFDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHSTX achieves a -4.12% return, which is significantly lower than PDFDX's 1.98% return. Over the past 10 years, PHSTX has underperformed PDFDX with an annualized return of 8.58%, while PDFDX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.82% annualized return.


PHSTX

1D
-1.14%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
-4.12%
6M
-4.03%
1Y
13.40%
3Y*
6.64%
5Y*
5.91%
10Y*
8.58%

PDFDX

1D
-0.19%
1M
5.46%
YTD
1.98%
6M
2.97%
1Y
31.05%
3Y*
8.77%
5Y*
-4.76%
10Y*
9.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHSTX vs. PDFDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PHSTX
Putnam Global Health Care Fund
-4.12%15.20%1.35%9.11%-4.88%19.60%15.94%30.26%-0.76%15.30%
PDFDX
Perkins Discovery Fund
1.98%9.94%19.19%10.77%-39.93%2.11%62.16%15.01%22.19%11.58%

Correlation

The correlation between PHSTX and PDFDX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 1998

0.52

The correlation between PHSTX and PDFDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.56 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHSTX vs. PDFDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHSTX
PHSTX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
PHSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
PHSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

PDFDX
PDFDX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
PDFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
PDFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHSTX vs. PDFDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Global Health Care Fund (PHSTX) and Perkins Discovery Fund (PDFDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHSTXPDFDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.22

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

1.52

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.44

4.28

-0.84

PHSTX vs. PDFDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHSTX Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is comparable to the PDFDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHSTX and PDFDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHSTXPDFDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

1.29

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

-0.16

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.34

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.38

+0.23

Drawdowns

PHSTX vs. PDFDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHSTX drawdown since its inception was -45.51%, smaller than the maximum PDFDX drawdown of -67.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHSTX and PDFDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHSTXPDFDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.51%

-67.44%

+21.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.71%

-22.11%

+12.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.71%

-31.75%

+11.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.71%

-59.95%

+39.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.51%

-62.70%

+37.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.08%

-34.65%

+26.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.92%

-25.72%

+15.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.86%

7.80%

-3.94%

Volatility

PHSTX vs. PDFDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam Global Health Care Fund (PHSTX) is 4.04%, while Perkins Discovery Fund (PDFDX) has a volatility of 6.50%. This indicates that PHSTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDFDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHSTXPDFDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

6.50%

-2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.14%

18.09%

-7.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.14%

26.02%

-11.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.41%

29.80%

-15.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.78%

28.96%

-13.18%

PHSTX vs. PDFDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHSTX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than PDFDX's 2.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHSTX vs. PDFDX - Dividend Comparison

PHSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than PDFDX's 9.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDFDX
Perkins Discovery Fund
9.60%4.25%0.00%0.00%1.78%31.11%1.71%0.00%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PHSTX
Putnam Global Health Care Fund
1.86%1.79%4.92%5.62%7.82%11.98%9.58%5.72%6.82%17.31%10.65%13.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHSTX and PDFDX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDFDX has higher volatility (6.50%) compared to PHSTX (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHSTX dropped -45.51% vs PDFDX's -67.44%.

PDFDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHSTX and PDFDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer