PHSP.L vs. STZ
PHSP.L (WisdomTree Physical Silver) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while STZ (Constellation Brands, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, PHSP.L returned 14.58%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for STZ. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PHSP.L vs. STZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PHSP.L is traded in GBp, while STZ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the STZ values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHSP.L achieves a -5.51% return, which is significantly lower than STZ's 9.63% return. Over the past 10 years, PHSP.L has outperformed STZ with an annualized return of 14.58%, while STZ has yielded a comparatively lower 1.52% annualized return.
PHSP.L
- 1D
- 5.15%
- 1M
- -23.06%
- YTD
- -5.51%
- 6M
- 8.99%
- 1Y
- 87.72%
- 3Y*
- 38.02%
- 5Y*
- 19.89%
- 10Y*
- 14.58%
STZ
- 1D
- 3.86%
- 1M
- 6.62%
- YTD
- 9.63%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- -8.75%
- 3Y*
- -15.64%
- 5Y*
- -6.40%
- 10Y*
- 1.52%
PHSP.L vs. STZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHSP.L WisdomTree Physical Silver | -5.51% | 129.68% | 22.85% | -6.51% | 15.50% | -12.11% | 40.85% | 12.57% | -3.55% | -5.67% |
STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 9.63% | -40.55% | -5.49% | 0.54% | 4.70% | 17.22% | 13.96% | 15.29% | -24.50% | 37.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHSP.L and STZ is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHSP.L vs. STZ — Risk / Return Rank
PHSP.L
STZ
PHSP.L vs. STZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L) and Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PHSP.L | STZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.97 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | -0.34 | +2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.66 | -0.58 | +5.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PHSP.L vs. STZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHSP.L drawdown since its inception was -70.04%, which is greater than STZ's maximum drawdown of -53.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHSP.L and STZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHSP.L | STZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.04% | -53.37% | -16.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.16% | -25.57% | -16.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.16% | -53.37% | +11.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.16% | -53.37% | +11.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.16% | -53.37% | +11.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.18% | -45.87% | +6.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.03% | -12.48% | -31.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.77% | 15.15% | +3.62% |
Volatility
PHSP.L vs. STZ - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L) has a higher volatility of 14.36% compared to Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) at 8.45%. This indicates that PHSP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHSP.L | STZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.36% | 8.45% | +5.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.78% | 23.56% | +28.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.77% | 29.99% | +24.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.25% | 24.33% | +11.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.08% | 27.04% | +4.04% |
Dividends
PHSP.L vs. STZ - Dividend Comparison
PHSP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHSP.L WisdomTree Physical Silver | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STZ Constellation Brands, Inc. | 2.75% | 2.95% | 1.77% | 1.44% | 1.36% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 1.58% | 1.70% | 0.86% | 0.98% | 0.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PHSP.L and STZ have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for PHSP.L and STZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer