PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHSP.L vs. SEML.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHSP.L vs. SEML.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PHSP.L is traded in GBp, while SEML.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SEML.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHSP.L achieves a -22.02% return, which is significantly lower than SEML.L's 0.87% return. Over the past 10 years, PHSP.L has outperformed SEML.L with an annualized return of 10.07%, while SEML.L has yielded a comparatively lower 1.79% annualized return.


PHSP.L

1D
-0.64%
1M
-16.75%
6M
-37.43%
YTD
-22.02%
1Y
45.55%
3Y*
28.72%
5Y*
16.80%
10Y*
10.07%

SEML.L

1D
0.09%
1M
-1.55%
6M
0.10%
YTD
0.87%
1Y
6.67%
3Y*
4.46%
5Y*
2.11%
10Y*
1.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHSP.L vs. SEML.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PHSP.L
WisdomTree Physical Silver
-22.02%129.68%22.85%-6.51%15.50%-12.11%40.85%12.57%-3.55%-5.67%
SEML.L
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF
0.87%10.31%-1.20%5.42%-0.23%-9.48%-1.55%8.21%0.03%4.91%

Correlation

The correlation between PHSP.L and SEML.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2011

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHSP.L vs. SEML.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHSP.L
PHSP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PHSP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHSP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHSP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
PHSP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHSP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

SEML.L
SEML.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SEML.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEML.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEML.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SEML.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEML.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHSP.L vs. SEML.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PHSP.LSEML.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.21

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.92

1.39

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.96

3.87

-1.91

PHSP.L vs. SEML.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHSP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is comparable to the SEML.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHSP.L and SEML.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PHSP.L vs. SEML.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHSP.L drawdown since its inception was -70.04%, which is greater than SEML.L's maximum drawdown of -46.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHSP.L and SEML.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHSP.LSEML.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.04%

-46.67%

-23.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.80%

-4.78%

-45.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.80%

-4.78%

-45.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.80%

-11.11%

-38.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.80%

-21.24%

-28.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.80%

-12.68%

-37.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.03%

-26.70%

-17.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.43%

1.72%

+21.71%

Volatility

PHSP.L vs. SEML.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L) has a higher volatility of 12.52% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L) at 1.36%. This indicates that PHSP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEML.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHSP.LSEML.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.52%

1.36%

+11.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.48%

4.59%

+45.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.31%

5.73%

+50.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.72%

7.47%

+29.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.04%

9.26%

+21.78%

PHSP.L vs. SEML.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHSP.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than SEML.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHSP.L vs. SEML.L - Dividend Comparison

PHSP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SEML.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PHSP.L
WisdomTree Physical Silver
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SEML.L
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF
5.65%5.44%5.55%5.05%5.25%4.58%5.13%5.44%7.30%6.75%6.78%5.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHSP.L and SEML.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PHSP.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PHSP.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SEML.L.

PHSP.L is categorized as Silver, while SEML.L is Emerging Markets Bonds. PHSP.L tracks LBMA Silver Price, while SEML.L tracks JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for PHSP.L and 0.50% for SEML.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHSP.L and SEML.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer