PHSKX vs. TGFRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund (PHSKX) and Tanaka Growth Fund (TGFRX).
PHSKX is managed by Virtus. It was launched on Dec 31, 1975. TGFRX is managed by Tanaka. It was launched on Dec 30, 1998.
Performance
PHSKX vs. TGFRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PHSKX vs. TGFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHSKX Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund | -16.98% | -3.58% | 7.43% | 22.00% | -33.46% | 1.23% | 63.29% | 44.03% | 7.44% | 33.54% |
TGFRX Tanaka Growth Fund | -3.59% | 39.56% | 17.98% | 50.24% | -22.62% | 26.54% | 50.87% | 18.78% | -25.18% | 7.28% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHSKX achieves a -16.98% return, which is significantly lower than TGFRX's -3.59% return. Over the past 10 years, PHSKX has underperformed TGFRX with an annualized return of 9.22%, while TGFRX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.08% annualized return.
PHSKX
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- -12.64%
- YTD
- -16.98%
- 6M
- -21.04%
- 1Y
- -12.53%
- 3Y*
- -0.34%
- 5Y*
- -5.82%
- 10Y*
- 9.22%
TGFRX
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- -9.89%
- YTD
- -3.59%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 26.15%
- 3Y*
- 28.80%
- 5Y*
- 10.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PHSKX vs. TGFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHSKX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is lower than TGFRX's 2.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PHSKX vs. TGFRX — Risk / Return Rank
PHSKX
TGFRX
PHSKX vs. TGFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund (PHSKX) and Tanaka Growth Fund (TGFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PHSKX | TGFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | 1.31 | -1.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | 2.02 | -2.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.26 | -0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | 2.24 | -2.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.91 | 5.75 | -7.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PHSKX | TGFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.55 | 1.31 | -1.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.24 | 0.01 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.02 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.02 | +0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between PHSKX and TGFRX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PHSKX vs. TGFRX - Dividend Comparison
PHSKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 55.82%, more than TGFRX's 13.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHSKX Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund | 55.82% | 46.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.53% | 0.10% | 0.62% | 2.19% | 6.10% | 1.60% | 1.54% |
TGFRX Tanaka Growth Fund | 13.51% | 13.02% | 6.89% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 7.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PHSKX vs. TGFRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHSKX drawdown since its inception was -81.79%, smaller than the maximum TGFRX drawdown of -95.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHSKX and TGFRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHSKX | TGFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.79% | -95.35% | +13.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.77% | -16.01% | -7.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.87% | -95.35% | +48.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.87% | -95.35% | +48.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.21% | -92.80% | +54.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.38% | -31.67% | +2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.55% | 7.21% | +0.34% |
Volatility
PHSKX vs. TGFRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund (PHSKX) is 5.63%, while Tanaka Growth Fund (TGFRX) has a volatility of 11.19%. This indicates that PHSKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TGFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PHSKX | TGFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.63% | 11.19% | -5.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.98% | 23.73% | -9.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.67% | 34.96% | -12.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.76% | 793.45% | -768.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.43% | 561.16% | -537.73% |