PHSKX vs. COWG
PHSKX (Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund) and COWG (Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, PHSKX returned 1.42%/yr vs 22.71%/yr for COWG. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PHSKX charges 1.24%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for COWG.
Performance
PHSKX vs. COWG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHSKX achieves a -7.33% return, which is significantly lower than COWG's 7.76% return.
PHSKX
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- -7.33%
- 6M
- -8.66%
- 1Y
- -11.00%
- 3Y*
- 1.42%
- 5Y*
- -5.03%
- 10Y*
- 10.74%
COWG
- 1D
- -2.57%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- 7.76%
- 6M
- 5.91%
- 1Y
- 10.41%
- 3Y*
- 22.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PHSKX vs. COWG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHSKX Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund | -7.33% | -3.58% | 7.43% | 22.00% | -1.78% |
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | 7.76% | 10.24% | 34.99% | 20.69% | -0.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHSKX and COWG is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2022 | 0.84 |
The correlation between PHSKX and COWG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHSKX vs. COWG — Risk / Return Rank
PHSKX
COWG
PHSKX vs. COWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund (PHSKX) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PHSKX | COWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.12 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | 0.97 | -1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | 2.81 | -3.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PHSKX vs. COWG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHSKX drawdown since its inception was -81.79%, which is greater than COWG's maximum drawdown of -23.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHSKX and COWG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHSKX | COWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.79% | -23.60% | -58.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.77% | -10.79% | -12.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.26% | -23.60% | -3.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.02% | -4.21% | -26.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.38% | -3.27% | -26.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.36% | 3.72% | +6.64% |
Volatility
PHSKX vs. COWG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund (PHSKX) is 6.34%, while Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) has a volatility of 7.27%. This indicates that PHSKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHSKX | COWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.34% | 7.27% | -0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.32% | 13.29% | +2.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.50% | 17.03% | +2.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.87% | 19.27% | +5.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.60% | 19.27% | +4.33% |
PHSKX vs. COWG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHSKX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than COWG's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
PHSKX vs. COWG - Dividend Comparison
PHSKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 50.01%, more than COWG's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | 0.37% | 0.32% | 0.40% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PHSKX Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund | 50.01% | 46.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.53% | 0.10% | 0.62% | 2.19% | 6.10% | 1.60% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PHSKX and COWG have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COWG has higher volatility (7.27%) compared to PHSKX (6.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHSKX dropped -81.79% vs COWG's -23.60%.
COWG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PHSKX and COWG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer