PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHSKX vs. MMGPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHSKX vs. MMGPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund (PHSKX) and Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHSKX achieves a -4.02% return, which is significantly lower than MMGPX's 6.58% return.


PHSKX

1D
1.90%
1M
2.63%
YTD
-4.02%
6M
-6.78%
1Y
-9.46%
3Y*
3.17%
5Y*
-3.37%
10Y*
10.76%

MMGPX

1D
-1.64%
1M
5.85%
YTD
6.58%
6M
2.50%
1Y
4.84%
3Y*
26.16%
5Y*
-3.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHSKX vs. MMGPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PHSKX
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund
-4.02%-3.58%7.43%22.00%-33.46%1.23%63.29%44.03%7.44%26.36%
MMGPX
Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio
6.58%12.58%41.83%44.34%-63.37%-11.55%152.67%40.20%10.89%28.18%

Correlation

The correlation between PHSKX and MMGPX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.85

The correlation between PHSKX and MMGPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHSKX vs. MMGPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHSKX
PHSKX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
PHSKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHSKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHSKX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
PHSKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHSKX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

MMGPX
MMGPX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
MMGPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMGPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMGPX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
MMGPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMGPX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHSKX vs. MMGPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund (PHSKX) and Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHSKXMMGPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.45

0.22

-0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.50

0.50

-1.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.06

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.35

0.22

-0.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.86

0.47

-1.33

PHSKX vs. MMGPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHSKX Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is lower than the MMGPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHSKX and MMGPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHSKXMMGPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.45

0.22

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

-0.09

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.46

-0.12

Drawdowns

PHSKX vs. MMGPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHSKX drawdown since its inception was -81.79%, which is greater than MMGPX's maximum drawdown of -75.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHSKX and MMGPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHSKXMMGPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.79%

-75.38%

-6.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.77%

-27.79%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.26%

-29.27%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.87%

-72.70%

+25.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.56%

-36.32%

+7.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.39%

-30.24%

+0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.80%

13.11%

-3.31%

Volatility

PHSKX vs. MMGPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund (PHSKX) is 5.95%, while Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX) has a volatility of 8.88%. This indicates that PHSKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMGPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHSKXMMGPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.95%

8.88%

-2.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.66%

20.96%

-6.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.94%

27.57%

-8.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.80%

39.71%

-14.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.55%

35.22%

-11.67%

PHSKX vs. MMGPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHSKX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than MMGPX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHSKX vs. MMGPX - Dividend Comparison

PHSKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.29%, more than MMGPX's 0.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MMGPX
Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio
0.40%0.43%0.00%0.00%125.40%64.53%7.93%15.63%28.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PHSKX
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund
48.29%46.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.53%0.10%0.62%2.19%6.10%1.60%1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHSKX and MMGPX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMGPX has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to PHSKX (5.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHSKX dropped -81.79% vs MMGPX's -75.38%.

MMGPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHSKX and MMGPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer