PHSKX vs. KMKNX
PHSKX (Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund) and KMKNX (Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, PHSKX returned 10.74%/yr vs 19.20%/yr for KMKNX. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PHSKX charges 1.24%/yr vs 1.40%/yr for KMKNX.
Performance
PHSKX vs. KMKNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHSKX achieves a -7.33% return, which is significantly lower than KMKNX's 6.71% return. Over the past 10 years, PHSKX has underperformed KMKNX with an annualized return of 10.74%, while KMKNX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.20% annualized return.
PHSKX
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- -7.33%
- 6M
- -8.66%
- 1Y
- -11.00%
- 3Y*
- 1.42%
- 5Y*
- -5.03%
- 10Y*
- 10.74%
KMKNX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -9.75%
- YTD
- 6.71%
- 6M
- 4.98%
- 1Y
- -1.36%
- 3Y*
- 31.59%
- 5Y*
- 13.92%
- 10Y*
- 19.20%
PHSKX vs. KMKNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHSKX Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund | -7.33% | -3.58% | 7.43% | 22.00% | -33.46% | 1.23% | 63.29% | 44.03% | 7.44% | 33.54% |
KMKNX Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class | 6.71% | -3.09% | 84.05% | -7.34% | 14.98% | 28.03% | 19.56% | 22.76% | -10.68% | 47.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHSKX and KMKNX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2006 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PHSKX and KMKNX has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHSKX vs. KMKNX — Risk / Return Rank
PHSKX
KMKNX
PHSKX vs. KMKNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund (PHSKX) and Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class (KMKNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PHSKX | KMKNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.00 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | -0.11 | -0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | -0.29 | -0.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PHSKX vs. KMKNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHSKX drawdown since its inception was -81.79%, which is greater than KMKNX's maximum drawdown of -65.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHSKX and KMKNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHSKX | KMKNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.79% | -65.47% | -16.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.77% | -20.13% | -3.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.26% | -28.27% | +1.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.87% | -31.47% | -15.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.87% | -31.47% | -15.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.02% | -21.74% | -9.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.38% | -15.28% | -14.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.36% | 7.86% | +2.50% |
Volatility
PHSKX vs. KMKNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund (PHSKX) is 6.34%, while Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class (KMKNX) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that PHSKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KMKNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHSKX | KMKNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.34% | 7.01% | -0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.32% | 19.60% | -4.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.50% | 23.85% | -4.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.87% | 26.50% | -1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.60% | 23.71% | -0.11% |
PHSKX vs. KMKNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHSKX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is lower than KMKNX's 1.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
PHSKX vs. KMKNX - Dividend Comparison
PHSKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 50.01%, more than KMKNX's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMKNX Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class | 0.62% | 0.66% | 0.81% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 1.56% | 0.26% | 0.33% | 9.13% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PHSKX Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund | 50.01% | 46.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.53% | 0.10% | 0.62% | 2.19% | 6.10% | 1.60% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PHSKX and KMKNX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KMKNX has higher volatility (7.01%) compared to PHSKX (6.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHSKX dropped -81.79% vs KMKNX's -65.47%.
KMKNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.10 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PHSKX and KMKNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer