PHSKX vs. FMDGX
PHSKX (Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund) and FMDGX (Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PHSKX returned -4.66%/yr vs 5.27%/yr for FMDGX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PHSKX charges 1.24%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FMDGX.
Performance
PHSKX vs. FMDGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHSKX achieves a -4.48% return, which is significantly lower than FMDGX's 4.36% return.
PHSKX
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 3.01%
- 6M
- -6.98%
- YTD
- -4.48%
- 1Y
- -8.38%
- 3Y*
- 1.02%
- 5Y*
- -4.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.37%
FMDGX
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 4.36%
- 1Y
- 4.09%
- 3Y*
- 13.96%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- —
PHSKX vs. FMDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PHSKX Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund | -4.48% | -3.58% | 7.43% | 22.00% | -33.46% | 1.23% | 63.29% | 3.09% |
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund | 4.36% | 8.60% | 22.03% | 25.79% | -26.67% | 12.67% | 34.84% | 4.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHSKX and FMDGX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.93 |
The correlation between PHSKX and FMDGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHSKX vs. FMDGX — Risk / Return Rank
PHSKX
FMDGX
PHSKX vs. FMDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund (PHSKX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PHSKX | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.04 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.41 | 0.21 | -0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.91 | 0.60 | -1.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PHSKX vs. FMDGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHSKX drawdown since its inception was -81.79%, which is greater than FMDGX's maximum drawdown of -38.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHSKX and FMDGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHSKX | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.79% | -38.59% | -43.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.77% | -14.75% | -9.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.26% | -25.30% | -1.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.87% | -38.59% | -8.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.91% | -2.69% | -26.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.38% | -11.07% | -18.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.76% | 5.11% | +5.65% |
Volatility
PHSKX vs. FMDGX - Volatility Comparison
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund (PHSKX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) have volatilities of 6.40% and 6.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHSKX | FMDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.40% | 6.14% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.66% | 13.69% | +1.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.69% | 17.31% | +2.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.92% | 22.51% | +2.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.54% | 24.27% | -0.73% |
PHSKX vs. FMDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHSKX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than FMDGX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
PHSKX vs. FMDGX - Dividend Comparison
PHSKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.52%, more than FMDGX's 1.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund | 1.78% | 1.85% | 0.47% | 0.63% | 0.81% | 6.43% | 0.36% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PHSKX Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund | 48.52% | 46.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.53% | 0.10% | 0.62% | 2.19% | 6.10% | 1.60% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, PHSKX and FMDGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PHSKX has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to FMDGX (6.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHSKX dropped -81.79% vs FMDGX's -38.59%.
FMDGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.18 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PHSKX and FMDGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer