PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHR vs. VTHR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PHR vs. VTHR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Phreesia, Inc. (PHR) and Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PHR vs. VTHR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PHR
Phreesia, Inc.
-50.47%-32.75%8.68%-28.46%-22.32%-23.22%103.68%6.22%
VTHR
Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF
-3.96%16.99%23.57%25.92%-19.20%25.49%20.93%8.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHR achieves a -50.47% return, which is significantly lower than VTHR's -3.96% return.


PHR

1D
-26.56%
1M
-32.04%
YTD
-50.47%
6M
-64.37%
1Y
-67.21%
3Y*
-36.21%
5Y*
-31.39%
10Y*

VTHR

1D
2.96%
1M
-5.00%
YTD
-3.96%
6M
-1.71%
1Y
17.90%
3Y*
17.74%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
13.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHR vs. VTHR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHR
PHR Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
PHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHR Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
PHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHR Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

VTHR
VTHR Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VTHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTHR Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VTHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTHR Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHR vs. VTHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Phreesia, Inc. (PHR) and Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHRVTHRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.25

0.97

-2.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-2.00

1.48

-3.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.70

1.22

-0.52

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.91

1.50

-2.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.89

7.15

-9.04

PHR vs. VTHR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHR Sharpe Ratio is -1.25, which is lower than the VTHR Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHR and VTHR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHRVTHRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.25

0.97

-2.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.53

0.61

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.25

0.80

-1.05

Correlation

The correlation between PHR and VTHR is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PHR vs. VTHR - Dividend Comparison

PHR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PHR
Phreesia, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTHR
Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF
1.16%1.08%1.19%1.47%1.52%1.16%1.37%1.65%1.89%1.63%1.82%1.84%

Drawdowns

PHR vs. VTHR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHR drawdown since its inception was -89.60%, which is greater than VTHR's maximum drawdown of -34.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHR and VTHR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PHRVTHRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.60%

-34.61%

-54.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-74.25%

-12.32%

-61.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.81%

-25.06%

-63.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.60%

-6.21%

-83.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.80%

-4.08%

-45.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.78%

2.58%

+33.20%

Volatility

PHR vs. VTHR - Volatility Comparison

Phreesia, Inc. (PHR) has a higher volatility of 33.15% compared to Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) at 5.51%. This indicates that PHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PHRVTHRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.15%

5.51%

+27.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.64%

9.82%

+38.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.80%

18.62%

+35.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.96%

17.30%

+42.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.65%

17.82%

+41.83%