PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHM vs. PSLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHM vs. PSLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHM achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly higher than PSLV's -1.78% return. Over the past 10 years, PHM has outperformed PSLV with an annualized return of 21.52%, while PSLV has yielded a comparatively lower 13.97% annualized return.


PHM

1D
-0.48%
1M
1.79%
YTD
0.17%
6M
-9.69%
1Y
19.74%
3Y*
20.02%
5Y*
16.65%
10Y*
21.52%

PSLV

1D
-2.76%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
-1.78%
6M
18.46%
1Y
100.09%
3Y*
41.73%
5Y*
18.43%
10Y*
13.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHM vs. PSLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PHM
PulteGroup, Inc.
0.17%8.54%6.22%128.76%-19.22%34.03%12.55%51.33%-20.76%83.43%
PSLV
Sprott Physical Silver Trust
-1.78%145.08%19.43%-1.94%2.74%-14.13%42.81%16.99%-11.83%4.28%

Correlation

The correlation between PHM and PSLV is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2010

0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PHM:

$22.72B

PSLV:

$14.73B

EPS

PHM:

$10.36

PSLV:

$13.57

PE Ratio

PHM:

11.31

PSLV:

1.71

PEG Ratio

PHM:

0.80

PSLV:

0.00

PS Ratio

PHM:

1.37

PSLV:

218.98

PB Ratio

PHM:

1.75

PSLV:

0.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

PHM:

$16.83B

PSLV:

$64.19M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PHM:

$4.39B

PSLV:

$404.67M

EBITDA (TTM)

PHM:

$2.76B

PSLV:

$8.21B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHM vs. PSLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHM
PHM Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
PHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
PHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHM Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

PSLV
PSLV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
PSLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
PSLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSLV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHM vs. PSLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHMPSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.32

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

2.48

-1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.75

5.50

-3.76

PHM vs. PSLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHM Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the PSLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHM and PSLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHMPSLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

1.72

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.52

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.45

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.17

+0.08

Drawdowns

PHM vs. PSLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHM drawdown since its inception was -92.40%, which is greater than PSLV's maximum drawdown of -79.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHM and PSLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHMPSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.40%

-79.38%

-13.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.60%

-40.65%

+18.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.01%

-40.65%

+2.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.01%

-40.65%

+2.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.11%

-42.79%

-19.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.41%

-36.11%

+15.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.49%

-58.15%

+22.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.33%

18.25%

-6.92%

Volatility

PHM vs. PSLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) is 8.08%, while Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) has a volatility of 16.57%. This indicates that PHM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHMPSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.08%

16.57%

-8.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.17%

57.35%

-34.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.98%

58.49%

-24.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.63%

35.64%

-1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.46%

31.14%

+5.32%

Dividends

PHM vs. PSLV - Dividend Comparison

PHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while PSLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PHM
PulteGroup, Inc.
0.82%0.78%0.75%0.66%1.34%1.00%1.16%1.16%1.46%1.08%1.96%1.85%
PSLV
Sprott Physical Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHM and PSLV have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSLV has higher volatility (16.57%) compared to PHM (8.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHM dropped -92.40% vs PSLV's -79.38%.

PSLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHM and PSLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer