PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHIYX vs. FBCGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHIYX vs. FBCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO High Yield Fund (PHIYX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHIYX achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than FBCGX's 8.27% return.


PHIYX

1D
0.25%
1M
-0.87%
6M
0.08%
YTD
0.34%
1Y
4.45%
3Y*
7.31%
5Y*
3.19%
10Y*
4.67%
ALL TIME*
6.72%

FBCGX

1D
3.46%
1M
-4.90%
6M
8.44%
YTD
8.27%
1Y
21.38%
3Y*
24.49%
5Y*
13.37%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PHIYX vs. FBCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PHIYX
PIMCO High Yield Fund
0.34%8.60%6.81%12.83%-11.96%4.07%5.37%14.96%-2.47%2.87%
FBCGX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund
8.27%21.33%38.15%55.57%-37.84%23.00%62.92%36.11%-2.33%14.15%

Correlation

The correlation between PHIYX and FBCGX is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017

0.47

The correlation between PHIYX and FBCGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHIYX vs. FBCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PHIYX
PHIYX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
PHIYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHIYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHIYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
PHIYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHIYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

FBCGX
FBCGX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
FBCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
FBCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PHIYX vs. FBCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO High Yield Fund (PHIYX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PHIYXFBCGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.17

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

1.53

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.66

5.24

+3.42

PHIYX vs. FBCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHIYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the FBCGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHIYX and FBCGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PHIYX vs. FBCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHIYX drawdown since its inception was -32.73%, smaller than the maximum FBCGX drawdown of -42.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHIYX and FBCGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHIYXFBCGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.73%

-42.55%

+9.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.58%

-12.64%

+10.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.54%

-26.83%

+23.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.74%

-42.55%

+26.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-9.02%

+8.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.17%

-8.82%

+6.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.57%

3.68%

-3.11%

Volatility

PHIYX vs. FBCGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO High Yield Fund (PHIYX) is 0.73%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX) has a volatility of 7.25%. This indicates that PHIYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHIYXFBCGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

7.25%

-6.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.82%

16.64%

-13.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.45%

20.62%

-17.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.31%

25.40%

-20.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.58%

24.94%

-19.36%

PHIYX vs. FBCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHIYX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than FBCGX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHIYX vs. FBCGX - Dividend Comparison

PHIYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.95%, more than FBCGX's 0.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBCGX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund
0.89%0.97%0.62%0.26%0.12%6.71%1.26%0.28%0.46%0.13%0.00%0.00%
PHIYX
PIMCO High Yield Fund
5.95%6.19%6.18%5.62%6.01%4.53%4.55%5.04%5.63%5.11%5.37%8.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHIYX and FBCGX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBCGX has higher volatility (7.25%) compared to PHIYX (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHIYX dropped -32.73% vs FBCGX's -42.55%.

PHIYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHIYX and FBCGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer